nobody / nobody is on Nostr

"c52f97d87e16f1c6c47de3eba31a429c53c68d3bbbf90b8eed5b2d502b6e310fd3836db1c23dee231ef674fc2dfb50fe75d812bc1a44de8a01dc8a9225249c3a"

Last Notes

2026-06-30 13:47:31 UTC

- reply

You guys just closed my Bringin account out of the blue.
Now what?
https://blossom.primal.net/8e4c524917a3b6195f46e8a07e9ecce71a75377cac6cec03d06d24692dc3046c.png

2026-06-26 07:41:05 UTC

"People were priced out of owning a home, then sold a lifetime of monthly payments as if that was progress." — @nprofile…g4xq

2026-02-28 07:47:45 UTC

- reply

You heard "overwhelming rejection"?
PR #32359 (the predecessor to #32406) got 423 downvotes before Peter Todd rage-closed it.
Then he admitted on Stacker: "I was asked to open it by an active Core dev because entities like Citrea are using unprunable outputs instead of OP_RETURN."
Let that sink in: Core devs are taking orders from Citrea - a ZK-Rollup company that wants to bloat your node with unprunable garbage so they can sell "solutions" to the problem they create.
BIP-110 doesn't face "overwhelming rejection" - it faces overwhelming FEAR from the data landfill industry.
The same suits who tried to force #32406 through with 138 downvotes and 93 NACKs are now terrified because Knots users actually enforce limits. They can't rent-seek on a pruned chain.
"Technical folk" who reject BIP-110 are either:
1. Paid by Citrea/Casa/MARA/Blockstream to keep the spam flowing
2. Useful idiots who think "censorship resistance" means subsidizing corporate data storage
Real Bitcoiners - the ones running Knots, the ones who actually validate - support BIP-110 because it stops the attack.
423 downvotes on the spam PR. That's the real consensus.
Run Knots. Filter the suits.
#BIP110 #Knots
Sources:
- PR #32359 received 423 downvotes from node operators rejecting OP_RETURN limit removal
https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/32359
- Peter Todd on Stacker News: "I was asked to open it by an active Core dev because entities like Citrea are using unprunable outputs"
https://stacker.news/items/971277?commentId=971434
- PR #32406 merged despite 93 community NACKs, showing Core maintainer capture
https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/32406
https://blossom.primal.net/95ef597893b1e38a6848695e561fd05ac0ec9c00cd5d6cfba20a8be4f8beda93.png
https://blossom.primal.net/e4dd8125a864749203fc3a8c926512bd338b030a80c695067708f90a5a0944c8.png
https://blossom.primal.net/14c2b5c233e5bcf767fe382c43386f0ac59f38cf712fd2fda68fa97a48e58226.png

2026-02-27 17:16:29 UTC

- reply

One more good explanation just dropped
https://youtu.be/JJwwVcdHlV0

2026-02-26 21:19:27 UTC

- reply

Ah, they used paper Bitcoin, that explains:
https://youtu.be/QW1YSktWBLQ

2026-02-26 10:41:24 UTC

- reply

It's surprising how easy it is to have an algorithm capable of gatekeeping the price of the best-performing asset globally. 🤔

2025-05-19 17:03:24 UTC

- reply

FWIW, it shows up as normal in Amethyst though:
https://blossom.primal.net/9e18876aae2428d15e3bfae2798fc63e3d18beaa6eb84bf830c8623134049b2e.png

2024-08-18 23:18:08 UTC

- reply

And is powered by Akash Supercloud ;)
Refs.
https://x.com/akashnet_/status/1823462416597856358
P.S.
You can also play with our free chat here:
https://chat.akash.network

2024-06-12 19:22:16 UTC

- reply

#BTCPrague #Prague