dsbatten
Daniel Batten

http://www.danielbatten.co

I like turning waste into power. Landfill gas. Eroding currencies. The human potential.

Public Key

npub13lkyycj8s3da6fhndtj0wd6s3s2ahmq86s7wrruvzd4tnc66cgfqn4lpsy

NIP-05 Address

Profile Code

nprofile1qqsglmzzvfrcgk7aymek4e8hxaggc9wmasrag08p37xpx64euddvyysprpmhxue69uhkc6t8dp6xu6twvaex2mrp0yhxxmmdqythwumn8ghj7un9d3shjtnrw4e8yetwwshxv7tf9tug8r

Publishing to

nostr-pub.wellorder.net

Author Public Key

npub13lkyycj8s3da6fhndtj0wd6s3s2ahmq86s7wrruvzd4tnc66cgfqn4lpsy

Show more details

Last Notes

2026-10-28 02:41:00 UTC

Nostr only post:
There's been some incredible steps forward with CH4Capital in the last 3 months: our fund that lends money to Bitcoin mining projects on landfills, so we can make the Bitcoin network the world's first carbon negative industry.
Perseverance and anti-fragility are important. But there’s something else that is even more important: surrender.
We never achieve anything in this life alone. If we do anything of merit, either we had the genetics for it, we met people along the way we learnt from - or both. Either way, where are we in the process? Everything was achieved through factors beyond us. It was only the point where I let go of the illusion “I am running an infrastructure fund that is going to …” realized I am not the doer and surrendered that help arrived in the most surprising forms and miracles restarted occurring.
I know for a fact as a coach that we are capable of much more than we imagine, and that this life is a chance to explore what that is.
Whether that’s building a garden, a family or a methane mitigation fund is immaterial - but my wish is that you discover and then walk your true path, during this lifetime.

2026-10-22 21:22:49 UTC

Recently I was talking to the partner of one of the world's most prestigious advertising and creative agencies about how Bitcoin mining makes destroying the world's landfill gas profitable.
He responded
“If I saw a better story out there that would change the world’s view on Bitcoin, I would start working on a new one immediately... But I don’t see a better story or angle. Nothing is even close.”

2026-10-05 15:41:01 UTC

Bitcoin will cause not one but two revolutions
Stabilizing the world's financial architecture
Stabilizing the world's energy architecture
The first one most people don't know there is, or make out that there isn't, a problem, so are therefore not ready for Bitcoin yet.
The second one, everyone agrees there is a problem, so are therefore ready for Bitcoin now.
The world needs Bitcoin
We've just been leading with the conversation they are not ready to have while ignoring the one they are ready to have.

2026-10-05 15:36:06 UTC

Bitcoin is energy money
But it is also a monetizer of energy
Both those are innovations the world has never had before
And the second quality if the one the world is ready for right now

2026-10-05 15:32:36 UTC

- reply

Bitcoin mining on landfills is going to be one of the stories that allows the world to fall in love with Bitcoin

2026-10-05 14:59:11 UTC

The world's attitude to Bitcoin mining is changing rapidly
For example, I just spent the weekend visiting 3 landfills where that country's government's environmental ministry identified that Bitcoin mining is the best solution to remove their hazardous methane emissions

2026-09-30 21:52:11 UTC

Few will understand why this post is significant, but I'll say it anyway because it will be more obvious in a year's time.
Landfill methane capture has been technically possible for decades. The obstacle was always economic.
2 problems:
No buyer for the power. Most landfills in the Global South can't sell electricity to the grid: no transmission lines, too expensive to upgrade the grid to handle the power, or govt regulations actively prevent it
Credits priced too low. On voluntary carbon markets, methane mitigation earns ~$5 per credit. That finances nothing.
Bitcoin mining solved the first problem: the miner buys every megawatt on site, no grid connection required.
Now it is starting to solve the second.
Under Article 6 of the Paris Agreement, a country that signs a cooperative agreement can sell its carbon credits on international compliance markets at ~$20 per credit instead of ~$5. That difference is what turns a marginal project into one investors will fund.
For years, several Latin American governments saw no reason to join. With no viable projects, why build the regulatory framework?
Bitcoin mining made the projects viable. Now the agreements are being signed.
The full sequence: a mining rig gives landfill gas its first buyer, the buyer makes the project viable, the viable project gives a government its reason to enter compliance carbon markets, and the compliance price funds the next ten projects.
Methane that has warmed the planet for decades is becoming the revenue that pays for its own destruction.
And the unlikely catalyst is Bitcoin mining: the industry everyone was once told was the climate's enemy.

2026-09-30 21:14:27 UTC

- reply

That's great to hear. Breathwork and meditation together is a powerful combination. If I've learnt one thing in life, its "once you've found something that works for you, go deep into it!"

2026-09-30 21:12:30 UTC

For people in Energy:
2021: evaluating Bitcoin mining is a career risk
2026: evaluating Bitcoin mining is no longer a career risk
2031: failure to evaluate Bitcoin mining is a career risk

2026-09-30 20:33:43 UTC

Methane from landfills shorten the lives and quality-of-life of children.
Bitcoin mining removes that methane profitably.
Probably nothing.

2026-09-30 19:46:39 UTC

When you invest in Bitcoin mining companies with dual revenue streams, you are accelerating Bitcoin acceptance (and therefore adoption), because you're growing the companies that advance the "Bitcoin solves an energy solution" conversation the world is ready to have

2026-09-30 15:15:39 UTC

A waste management consortium recently took over an country's landfills because they were emitting methane, causing harm to residents and deterring tourism
They concluded Bitcoin mining was the only viable solution
We just booked by tickets to visit them
Probably nothing

2026-09-29 15:25:10 UTC

- reply

In hindsight, it should have been obvious to me. The first talk I ever gave at a Bitcoin conference was about Bitcoin-and-energy. 2/3 of the audience who'd been listening to the previous speakers left before I said a word. But outside the Bitcoin conference, the video of that talk was watched by more than double the number of people as the next highest talk. Both the Bitcoiners (literally) leaving the room, and those outside Bitcoin leaning in were nothing to do with me, and everything to do with how important each community felf the content was, relative to the Bitcoin-and-money discussion.

2026-09-29 15:10:03 UTC

Of the peer reviewed papers on Bitcoin, >90% of them are on Bitcoin and energy
Of Cambridge's report on Bitcoin, >75% of the report is on Bitcoin mining
Of countries forming National Bitcoin Reserves through vehicles other than confiscation > 90% have done so using Bitcoin mining (only El Salvador purchased Bitcoin)
Of people routinely talking to political leaders about Bitcoin (including Prince Filip, Adam Back, myself) almost all of the leaders want to talk about Bitcoin and energy (versus a much more muted response to "Bitcoin and money")
Bitcoin is a fire waiting to burn. The Bitcoin-as-money conversation is the big log in the fire. It's the ultimate place we want to end up. But it's not the starting point. We've been trying to start a fire by holding a match to a big log.
Bitcoin mining is the kindling, it's the fire starter, because it solves so many energy problems that people have, and political leaders are struggling to find solutions to, right now!
Once Bitcoin mining creates acceptance of Bitcoin, from there it will be so much easier for the big log of Bitcoin-as-money to catch alight.

2026-09-29 15:02:42 UTC

Reflections post BTCHEL conference.
https://blossom.primal.net/2d3eaf420c392b62065f27431505f06f3efca6cddb8f36858bedae454df3211e.mov

2026-09-29 14:30:12 UTC

The one misleading narrative about Bitcoin that has been killed completely in mainstream media:
the "Bitcoin is bad for the environment/uses too much energy"
Because of this, its no longer a reputational risk for people to talk about Bitcoin mining solves energy problems.
As a result, Since 2024, a group of Bitcoin mining advocates is now making good strides forward across the world in talk with energy companies and https://blossom.primal.net/51605fa73da42f1f3123df7939c709ca7c437cfce16021e151b7cc65ca5c5695.mp4 governments about getting Bitcoin mining helping solve major and concurrent problems around their ailing grids, behind-schedule NZE targets, and near-EOL renewable and battery subsidy programs.

2026-09-29 13:47:19 UTC

- reply

Demand response is only one side of flexibility. Grids are also willing to pay Bitcoin mining companies to absorb excess load. Sweden is already paying for this for example. They used 14 MW of Bitcoin mining from Flexionics, and used the service 11,245 times last year, some for DR, mostly to absorb excess wind capacity.

2026-09-29 12:15:25 UTC

If you want to speed up bitcoin adoption, that means help bitcoin acceptance. If you want to help bitcoin acceptance, talk about how bitcoin solves a problem the person you are talking about has.
For store owners - that’s “how do I increase foot traffic and reduce card fees”
For anyone in govt, it’s often “how do I keep my grid stable and increase energy security?”
For an environmentalist it’s often “how do we phase out peaker plants and gas flaring while accelerating the green energy transition”
For policymakers and regulators it’s often “how do we adopt transactions in a way that’s much harder to use than traditional currency?”

2026-09-29 12:15:07 UTC

"Bitcoin (mining) as an energy solution" is the Trojan horse for Bitcoin as a monetary solution

2026-09-29 12:13:45 UTC

Of all the govt ministers I've met with, none of them wanted to talk about bitcoin as a monetary asset. All of them wanted to find out more about how bitcoin supports their energy and environmental goals.
This corresponds with the experiences of other people I've cross-referenced with who are meeting with senior members of Government, including Prince Filip, who recently said that the Bitcoin&energy conversation is the one they are most interested in having.

2026-09-29 12:06:35 UTC

I've recently met with 3 Government Ministers to talk about how with bitcoin mining, you don't need gas peaker plants to accompany new AI load, and how you can also reduce methane emissions.

2026-09-29 12:04:48 UTC

AI doesn't threaten net zero emission targets.
But AI without Bitcoin mining does.

2026-09-29 12:04:01 UTC

I am convinced that once Bitcoin mining is accepted as a necessary grid stabilizing and renewable expansion technology, the world will be able to finally accept Bitcoin as an important and impactful technology, and adoption will increase significantly.

2026-09-29 11:53:13 UTC

- reply

It'll probably be out in a couple of weeks. Will post it when it is.

2026-09-28 09:54:41 UTC

Just finished keynote in Helsinki on the (real) energy that powers Bitcoin.
No data. No charts. Instead I told 5 stories ... and based on the feedback it was probably my best talk yet.
https://blossom.primal.net/9b5f3d4afa7ad236086c06002d2d2eaae3b4f0b97f122388f72044fd0199316b.png

2026-09-21 14:19:01 UTC

I've tweeted a couple of times that Bitcoin wins when Bitcoiners become as anti-fragile as Bitcoin itself.
Here's 120 seconds on what this means, and how we start to do that.
https://blossom.primal.net/6186fb55d0b844a0f46166d7395a95cd7f0e5c505a25ec09ec8c944a27cf60a0.mp4

2026-09-19 21:58:04 UTC

Bitcoin volatility mirrors the inherent volatility of life. And what looks like the down are often not so.
For example, without Greenpeace USA's campaign against Bitcoin, people like me would never have come to Bitcoin in the first place.
Fighting Greenpeace USA was like running up a hill in rarefied air.
Everyone who did it returned to earth with a bigger lung capacity to advocate Bitcoin better than we could have:
we had better messages, more practice dealing with critics, more resilience, and were more connected to each other as a team.

2026-09-18 22:14:01 UTC

In the last 3 months we've gone from one landfill project in the pipeline in one country with us struggling to find a Bitcoin mining company wanting to take it on, to multiple landfill projects in multiple countries with multiple Bitcoin mining companies wanting to be involved, and landfill consortiums saying "we know we can't sell that power to the grid and that Bitcoin mining is our only realistic option, when are you doing site a visit?"
Probably nothing

2026-09-17 16:11:07 UTC

In 2006 I made a decision which meant I was working much more behind-the-scenes, but my impact went up about 10x
At the start of this year, I made a very similar decision, with the hope it would have a similar impact on the lives of people I care about working for Bitcoin https://blossom.primal.net/5abdf8e2879b91e2a078c2bdf880bafa4c80b251ef27ffad5cb91f2417ae892a.mov

2026-09-17 15:04:07 UTC

Issue #53 of the Bitcoin adoption letter is out. Check your email and spam filters.
https://www.batcoinz.com/p/what-hashrate-did
Included
- Analysis on how far through the BTC->AI datacenter Transition we are
- 2 reasons the hashrate decline has been good for thinks Bitcoiners care about
- Pretty charts based on new data
- And something different: what this could meet for trading hashprice and hashrate

2026-09-17 01:57:24 UTC

“Knowing the Bitcoin→AI transition consequence on hashrate” is to trading hashprice as “knowing about which large pension fund are about to allocate AUM to Bitcoin”, is to trading Bitcoin price.
Tomorrow's newsletter will have a section and some pretty charts about this.

2026-09-16 12:45:12 UTC

- reply

Full interview: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BY5vupruG7M

2026-09-16 12:44:23 UTC

https://blossom.primal.net/4f41276925fcdb9f39c64be9ba4b07206df86eb3d2a3740bd7e67561692f99e3.mp4 Luke and Brooke Cortese are Bitcoin legends
The rate at which they are orangepilling both businesses and everyday users is something we've not seen before.

2026-09-15 18:56:48 UTC

Why are so many of the inspiring stories about Bitcoin adoption coming out of Africa and Latin America?
https://blossom.primal.net/8d375c26697da2271364c89175b09d80973d7c4d90850dd78e73826dec5f73cd.mp4

2026-09-15 00:00:31 UTC

3 years ago the mainstream press had one Bitcoin mining story: and it was about wasted electricity.
Since then, as they started to better understand the technology, the narrative flipped on its head. None of them framed it as a change of position, so nobody noticed there had been one.
Here's my favorite 21 quotes on Bitcoin and energy from major news outlets since the narrative turned.
BBC
"The bitcoin mine now accounts for around 30% of the plant's revenue allowing them to keep the prices down for the local town."
Wall Street Journal
"Bhutan now boasts a stash of bitcoins worth $1.3 billion, or roughly 40% of the country's gross domestic product, according to cryptocurrency platform Arkham."
Al Jazeera
"In 2023, the Bhutanese government sold $100m of cryptocurrency to double the salaries of civil servants."
Euronews
"The country's crypto mines could, at least on paper, have little to no carbon footprint at all."
CNBC
"At one of the Gridless pilot sites in Kenya, the hydro plant dropped the price of power from 35 cents per kilowatt hour to 25 cents per kWh."
Business Insider
"Numbers from Ethiopia Electric Power show the country raked in over $55 million from electricity sales for Bitcoin mining in 2024 alone—18% of their total revenue."
UnHerd
"This initiative flips that narrative by using Bitcoin mining to fund energy in parts of Africa that are too poor or remote to merit connection to grids, but which do have plentiful supplies of potential power sources."
MIT Technology Review
"We're making Bitcoin out of surplus energy and monetizing something that otherwise has no value."
Financial Times
"The cryptocurrency could allow previously unprofitable, small electrical grids linked to local renewable energy to become "financially viable" in developing countries and in turn improve electricity access"
The Independent
"Solar and wind energy installations could earn hundreds of millions of dollars by mining bitcoin during periods of excess electricity generation, according to a new study."
Reuters
"Engie is looking at installing storage systems or bitcoin mining data centers at its new solar plant in Brazil to make the facility more profitable"
Fox Business
"Some 52.4% of sustainable energy sources are used for mining, led by 42.6% renewables, including wind and hydropower, as well as 9.8% nuclear."
Times of India
"excess heat from [Bitcoin mining] computing could support crop production while reducing fossil fuel use"
The Street
"partners in the transition to renewable energy"
Forbes
"bitcoin mining is the only technologically viable solution for mitigating methane emissions"
Reuters
"MARA's process captures gas that would have been flared"
Flares leak around 9% of the methane straight through. A generator destroys nearly all of it, which is why capture beats burning.
Bloomberg
"Iceland has become a refuge for Bitcoin miners as energy costs soar and regulatory pressure on cryptocurrency operations mount in the US and other countries."
What draws them is a renewable surplus Iceland has no other way to sell.
Fast Company
Bitcoin mining "could help address a chronic clean electricity oversupply problem, which has cost energy companies ~$1 billion in the last two years"
That is Brazil, and the billion is what the oversupply has already cost.
South China Morning Post
"Now, in a bid to turn this excess into economic gain, the government is embracing the energy-intensive business of cryptocurrency mining."
Laos built the dams first. The excess is hydro it cannot otherwise use.
NRK
"The data center accounted for 20 percent of Noranett's revenue. Now it's the remaining electricity customers who have to pay that bill."
The town had campaigned to close that site over the noise and cheered when it went. Grid tariffs then rose 20%, around 2,500 to 3,000 kroner a year per household.
Inc
"Once online, miners become part of the energy ecosystem and oftentimes adjust their daily power use to help balance the grid."
A smattering of negative coverage still runs. What has changed is that the positive coverage is no longer rare. In fact - it is now outnumbers the amount of negative coverage.
The shift started happening well before the media started reporting on AI datacenters, and was as a result of a number of researchers and Bitcoiners who put in the work to make this possible.
21 positive stories on Bitcoin and energy, and not one of them written by a Bitcoiner.
Worth celebrating!

2026-09-14 23:24:47 UTC

I've just crunched some numbers on the BTC->AI transition on the ERCOT (Texas grid).
TL;DR: there's a lot more switching still to come.
*This chart doesn't factor in that at least some ASICS are being sold to smaller BTC mining co's who are staying on ERCOT. https://blossom.primal.net/136e2ae7b070391eddc25be4e823f0adf57fd87160be28ab83bc8c6b3a734a9e.png

2026-09-11 20:52:26 UTC

- reply

Wish I could! But I'd be abusing the trust of 4 commercial entities and one nation state if I did! 🤣

2026-09-11 20:51:23 UTC

- reply

beautiful photos. It was great to see you both together in Lisbon earlier this year. You looked and look so happy together. Blessings for a wonderful future.

2026-09-11 19:57:21 UTC

The amount of things I know about Bitcoin adoption/Bitcoin mining and cannot say publicly has reached an all time high
... and all of it is bullish for Bitcoin and the mining industry!

2026-09-08 13:54:07 UTC

If you happen to be in Finland or close by later this month ...
25-26 Sept
https://btchel.com/
https://blossom.primal.net/00bfa3e8354c0a2c364cfd24e7f61607b7ad118b7d5c88f62d89cbc4c789e26d.png

2026-09-04 21:31:49 UTC

Adoption stalls when orangepilling fails
And our orangepilling has been failing a lot of late
But it doesn't have to.
This is one of the models I take the Bitcoiners I coach through, which has been working. So I thought I'd open source it.
https://blossom.primal.net/06d604a555d128f9b2b39691f8ed9c8af17472fa05bd9f7c33306c7f5e11e5ac.png

2026-08-19 15:01:17 UTC

Carbon Credits, who spent years writing negative pieces on Bitcoin mining just published an article stating that Bitcoin mining is "powering a cleaner future"
https://blossom.primal.net/4d30f3eecdb46298950ccf38199e54973b237bea6b4f737e641030b2b883f5fe.png
Full article:
https://carboncredits.com/bitcoin-price-below-60k-clean-energy-mining-sustainability/

2026-08-11 15:24:54 UTC

JUST IN: new peer-reviewed research finds Bitcoin mining has the capacity to absorb 83% of the wind Ireland is forced to throw away, lifting wind farm revenues by 32%.
This is probably the biggest wake-up call for grids around the world that are wasting large quantities of renewable energy, because the paper includes a head-to-head comparison with battery, finding 2 significant advantages, both which matter to the taxpayer.
1. No subsidy required:
"Compared with battery storage, hydrogen electrolysis, or transmission reinforcement, the co-investment is privately financed and operationally market-driven" and "...without requiring physical network upgrades or regulatory subsidy."
2. No performance degradation
"Unlike battery storage, mining incurs no round-trip efficiency losses or cycle degradation; unlike hydrogen electrolysis, it requires no downstream offtake infrastructure."
In layman's terms, this means that a battery gives back less power than it takes, and wears out with every cycle. Hydrogen needs a pipeline and a buyer at the far end. Bitcoin mining simply pays to use otherwise wasted power on the spot and needs nothing more after that.
Plus, Batteries, hydrogen and new wires are all paid for by the public. Bitcoin mining isn't.
To summarize: Together with previous papers on renewable energy monetization using Bitcoin mining, this technology is looking increasingly like the only tax-neutral way to keep renewable energy transition targets on track (or get them back on track).
The finding puts even more pressure on Ireland's neighbour, the UK, which continues to waste significant amounts of wind energy, to properly evaluate Bitcoin mining.
This paper is doubly-significant because prior studies were done on deregulated grids like ERCOT (Texas). This study shows that Bitcoin mining's benefits extend to islanded regulated grids with high renewable penetration.
The study comes at a time where Ireland is currently wasting11.4% of its available wind (source: https://cms.eirgrid.ie/sites/default/files/publications/Annual-Renewable-Constraint-and-Curtailment-Report-2025-V1.0.pdf). Its Climate Action Plan targets <7% curtailment by 2030. But an independent estimate says it's currently going in the opposite direction, projected to increase to16% by 2030, even with storage and demand response built (source: https://www.seai.ie/sites/default/files/2025-02/dess-background-material-2024%E2%80%932040.pdf).
The paper is published in Energy Economics which has an impact factor of 13.5 (top 2% of academic journals)
Source: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2026.109454
https://blossom.primal.net/4e9f1bb2f2897ff797c0e0ca554f5a603b96c9fc01f334ddb50ba48e57f530f8.png

2026-08-06 21:25:49 UTC

He stole another founder's habit
One day I was getting ready to run my mastermind call with a group of company founders, unaware that it was the group’s turn to teach me something that day.
I’d always known that the peer group was a powerful and easy way for people to change behaviors and become the best version of themselves. But I was about to realize something wholly new.
Stephen had been silent on the subject of the running habit that was sweeping the group. But this week he spoke up, and not in the way anyone expected.
"I've been able to steal Martin’s habit forming thing."
“You started running?” I was about to ask. But before the question could leave my lips he said.
“I started meditating”
He went on to describe that he didn’t feel the need to start running, as his exercise was already sorted, but he’d used the principles Martin had shared a few weeks ago about how he started his running habit, and used them to finally put in place a meditation practice he’d been meaning to instill for months.
Two weeks later he described where he had got to after two weeks meditation:
"I realized I’d probably only been running at about 10% of my potential... compared to what I normally could achieve. I felt like I've probably gone back to maybe 80%."
I asked whether that was energy or output. He answered “Both”. Then he landed on the number I had not expected:
"We've doubled our sales wins."
There was a collective “What???” on the group, like
‘You just let that win slide on in there like some minor side effect?”
Needless to say I asked “How?”
He said only that his conversations had been different. On a later call he told me what different meant.
He was calmer in each call.
He talked less and listened more.
He was more present and less attached to the outcome.
And that produced a completely different result from the same pipeline.
Here’s the thing: he did not even get better at selling.
He just stopped doing the things that were making him worse at it.
Every item on that list he gave me was something that had been negatively impacting his true potential to sell effectively, that he’d removed.
Nobody in that room taught him any new sales skills.
Nobody in that room even taught him to meditate!
Rather, one man described how he had made his running-habit stick. His peer heard the structure underneath it, lifted it out, and applied it to something completely different that was relevant to him.
That is what a peer group does that nothing else can.
Who is your peer group?
And do they bring out the best in you?

2026-07-28 23:50:22 UTC

JUST IN: Bitcoin is now 59.4% sustainably powered
🥇Higher than any reported global industry
⬆️Up 7.0% since last Cambridge survey 14 months ago
🌊Largest power source: hydro
Source: Cambridge 2026
https://blossom.primal.net/93fadca290d4b69a7bc535ebbfb0f7680c3a9c4c6ecfb0d57430640fc28a33d4.png

2026-07-28 23:33:26 UTC

The "waste of energy" argument doesn't survive a cold one.
https://blossom.primal.net/e3323b04e7cd605dfac0286a1a0638926232e7309e0ee428e33ff82402eeb3ee.png

2026-07-27 12:41:43 UTC

- reply

there should be!

2026-07-27 01:05:07 UTC

- reply

This is the vocal analysis of the voice of one of my clients who is doing his next capraise.

2026-07-24 14:58:36 UTC

I'm seriously geeking out on this image right now.
You can now use AI to help transform the 2nd-most recognizable part of you: your voice.
OK, some context. Years ago I wrote a book on pitching.
But it is really a book about any sort of situation where you seek to influence someone (like helping Bitcoin adoption through orangepilling).
I use the principles myself when changing people's minds about the Bitcoin and energy, and I also teach it to clients, who have a 91.1% success rate with their investment pitches (Industry average is apparently 10.4%, so seems like it works).
The book is a manual for improving all elements of influence: message, deliver, tactics and mindset. Unless all are strong, influence is unlikely to occur.
I was lucky enough to have spent a lot of my 20s doing acting for stage and TV, so I learnt how to improve delivery during those years and teach it to others. But I've never had a tool to objectively show people that their delivery has improved.
Now I do. This is just a snippet of a more extensive analysis that also gets quite technical with difference aspects of voice resonance. This client was someone I'd worked with previously to win his seed investment, but he came to me because when approaching seed-SeriesA he was getting feedback that his delivery was flat from his own team, and he agreed.
They were right! So we did a solid 2 months of voicework, and the harsh objective lens of AI is now saying his monotone is not only gone, but he's now speaking in the dynamic range.
Voicework has always tended to be something that felt subjective, but now thanks to AI it is appealing to analytical people who like the data too
We are only just beginning to tap the potential for AI for self-improvement.
https://blossom.primal.net/2781b5e0196e5a205e79b39fdbdaa0daa7b66344ba9f27221e29a761e7a85852.png

2026-07-22 22:47:44 UTC

Texas has begun replacing its most flexible load with its most inflexible one.
Hmmm.
https://blossom.primal.net/cf819e55b37c8c425412e1afbac4b903b17b7ec2d00a753267602f0287556f3f.png

2026-07-22 22:40:30 UTC

Bitcoin payments are not only the fastest to settle (instant) and the lowest fees, they are also the most enviromentally friendly.
When you choose visa etc over Bitcoin/lightning, you are choosing a network that is slow, dirty and expensive over one that is instant, clean and fair. https://blossom.primal.net/eaf314ae737d6430176244cc78bbc65b30b62522c7e859e5ca25383c5a585ef5.png

2026-07-15 15:03:03 UTC

The world is, and will continue to embrace Bitcoin's ability to solve an energy problem before it embraces Bitcoin's ability to solve a monetary problem. Because ... incentives. https://blossom.primal.net/065465a8b6f186c1f237084fd0fb8144667dda4f1f52e018d20dc30959263a07.mov

2026-07-14 13:43:43 UTC

In 5 minutes, this is the remarkable story of why Bitcoin mining is the only economically sustainable solution to the collision of the 2 biggest megatrends in the history of electricity
https://blossom.primal.net/f8be404e4e031ad6d0b382484d5b0562f71fdace72b9ea7c1f77cae6d6ff7b16.mov

2026-07-09 14:47:36 UTC

If someone says to you "Bitcoin is bad for the environment" here's my 2.47min coaching on how to respond. https://blossom.primal.net/9e118a42f7af696ecaa5b5a924541450891d7343c1a55150b7d29941e722cdbc.mp4
~95% of Bitcoiners currently don't do this, and it is a simple (and powerful) fix.

2026-06-04 15:44:25 UTC

I've made this newsletter edition a special free edition, because
1. It's inspiring story about a guy no-one's heard of, who's achieved something no other Bitcoin has yet achieved
2. There are more useful things to pay attention to right now than the price.
3. There's an important lesson in it that I believe can help Bitcoin adoption
https://www.batcoinz.com/p/the-truth-is-not-enough
Feel free to share this one widely, including with non-Bitcoiners.It's written for them too.

2026-06-02 18:41:49 UTC

As a kiwi, we have this thing called "Tall Poppy Syndrome" that makes me (still) reluctant even to repost what others say about me
... however, if you're doing something of value, its important people find out about it. A good coach from my experience is one of the biggest unlocks of your potential, and a coach who gets Bitcoin is rare.
Apparently I'm quite good at this, so if you have a project or mission that can advance Bitcoin - reach out.
Some recent unsolicited feedback from other Bitcoiners on coaching with me
Kent Halliburton (CEO Sazmining)
https://x.com/khalliburton/status/1887599468356190589
Tim Niemeyer (Founder IBC)
https://x.com/tim_niemeyer_/status/2014735140241465848
Ismael Dainehine (CEO Evergive)
https://x.com/ishabisinia/status/1997962004024189294
Scott Offord (CEO Bitcoin Mining World)
https://x.com/DSBatten/status/2061878510319210740
Michele Morucci (Founder Geyserfund)
https://x.com/metamick14/status/1887147848405270960

2026-05-18 03:06:35 UTC

I just got back from the Bitcoin Energy Summit in Lisbon and I have a question that won't leave me alone.
First some context: Bitcoin mining is now stabilizing the grids of 7 nations, 4 agencies (including the Spanish Govt and the World's largest energy policy association) just called for more flexible demand being critical to the resilience of the grids of the future - and Bitcoin mining is the world's most flexible load resource by an order of magnitude.
So in light of this my question is this: why is 95% of the Bitcoin adoption conversation about Bitcoin-as-money when Bitcoin-as-energy is already deployed on grids across three continents?
Is it possible that energy is the Bitcoin usecase that paves the road for mainstream acceptance of Bitcoin in the West?
I've been in this space for four years now. When I started, the conversation was "bitcoin mining wastes energy." A group of Bitcoiners including Troy Cross changed that. Then it became "ok maybe it doesn't waste energy, but it's not useful."
@nprofile…xncl , @nprofile…zj6n and others changed that too.
But here's what I noticed in Lisbon. Three separate European organisations - the European Bitcoin Energy Association, Free Madeira, and the Institut National de Bitcoin in France - are all independently converging on the same conclusion.
Rachel Geyer, Chair of EBEA said energy is what will move the needle for Bitcoin in Europe.
André Loja at Free Madeira said energy is the most topical issue in Europe right now.
Bastien Desteuque, directeur général at INBi (Bitcoin Policy Insitute of France) said they're focusing on mining because France has spare nuclear capacity and that's where the biggest opportunity is.
Three organisations. Same conclusion.
And that's before you get to what's actually being built. In Sweden, a man I coach runs ASIC hardware that earns almost two-thirds of its revenue from frequency regulation - keeping the lights on, responding in seconds to the need of the grid operator, and helping to stabilize the grid an incredible11,247 times last year alone. (Yes, you read that sentence right).
In Lisbon, I watched Kenji Tateiwa present a circular economy where bitcoin mining heat grows tropical fish and the CO2 gets converted to charcoal and micro diamonds. Bastian outlined how France's surplus nuclear energy could be absorbed by bitcoin mining by 2027.
The conversation has quietly moved from "does bitcoin mining help grids?" to "how many services can one machine provide?"
We've been thinking about this like monoculture - one machine, one function. What I saw in Lisbon is permaculture. The same hardware doing frequency regulation, heat capture, Sats-minting ... and potentially in the near future - voltage regulation (something that would have prevented the 28 April 2025 Iberian Peninsular Blackout.
I talked to Bitcoin founders after the keynote who told me the energy thesis had opened their eyes. These are people who worked to advance Bitcoin payment infrastructure, and they hadn't fully grasped this.
So here's my question. If energy is already Bitcoin's most mature real-world use case in the West - more deployed than payments, more proven than store-of-value at institutional scale - why are we still treating it as a footnote?
What other Bitcoin use case is this far along ... at least in the West?
Excited to see what happens next.

2026-04-28 00:01:40 UTC

Environmentally, Bitcoin has a positive:negative ratio of 31:1
This makes Bitcoin arguably one of the most important environmental-impact technology of our time
As a fund manager of 2 impact-funds, I said 4 years ago I consider it gross negligence for an ESG investor not to consider Bitcoin in their mix. Many called me crazy at the time. They are no longer saying that today (at least not for that reason!)
Here's a data summary from our due diligence four years ago (which has since been vindicated with 24 peer reviewed papers coming out in support of exactly the same findings we arrived at)
How did we reach this view?
Simple: we did our job as investors. ie: we did due diligence on Bitcoin and energy (something very few people were doing at the time before recycling what has since proven to be factually inaccorate claims)
Simple rue:
- relevant domain knowledge + data => we listen
- vested interest + narrative => ignore
We listened to grid operators, climate scientists, bitcoin mining engineers, methane abatement experts, solar&wind installers, academics with multi-disciplinary expertise across energy systems/ sustainability / bitcion mining/ economics/ policy
We found
- 21 ways Bitcoin could be an environmental positive
- 5 ways bitcoin could be an environmental negative
(Uncannily similar to the solar industry)
We then applied an impact weighting to each factor and remeasured The result was conclusive: Bitcoin mining is 31:1 net positive to the environment
Bitcoin mining’s rapid renewable adoption can inspire other industry sectors to follow
We found that in the next 5 years, Bitcoin mining would play a real part in global methane mitigation (it is), grid stabilization (it is), and monetizing wasted renewable energy (it is)
The rule is simple: do your own due diligence rather than listen to the opinions of anyone: be they media, politicians, environmental organisations, general energy experts or bitcoiners themselves
That's the path to truth
https://blossom.primal.net/a739633d86fb04e8773b3babd716715d825a1cb3f317da13d6cdb5d041acdc31.png

2026-04-19 03:43:34 UTC

Imagine if I said to you "Earth is an uninhabitable place to live"
You look at me sideways and say "Ah... why?"
I reply "Planets are awful bad. Pluto/Uranus/Neptune, you'd freeze. Mercury, you'd burn. Venus, you'd be poisoned. Jupiter and Saturn, you'd be crushed. Mars: nothing to breath.
It's true. Most of the planets, including over 5700 exoplanets, are really really bad places to live.
The conclusion that this means earth is uninhabitable is a basic logic fail.
Now imagine some self-proclaimed crypto-commentator tells you "Bitcoin is a scam"
Again, you look at him sideways and say "Ah... why?"
He replies "Most crypto has gone to zero. VCs dump on retail. Memecoins are complete rugpulls. Pre-mined tokens, you get diluted to oblivian. ICOs, you're the exit-liquidity for founders and early investors.
It's true. Most of the thousands of cryptocurrencies launched since 2009 are complete scams.
But again, the conclusion that this makes Bitcoin a scam is equally a basic logic 101 fail.
Earth is the only planet with a breathable atmosphere, the right temperature band, and liquid water.
Bitcoin is the only cryptocurrency with the combination of no insider enrichment, a fixed supply that nobody can change, and a 17-year unhacked decentralised ledger.
In both cases, some very special and unique features make the general rule inapplicable to the one obvious exception.
This logical fallacy has been around long enough to have a name. Aristotle spotted it about 2,300 years ago and called it the "Fallacy of Accident" - taking a pattern that's true for a category and forcing it onto the one member where evidence shows it obviously doesn't hold.
A few days ago, Ben McKenzie sat on Jon Stewart's podcast and committed this exact logic-fail: citing crypto's failures as his evidence against Bitcoin.
He's not the only one to fail in this way. Paul Krugman, Elizabeth Warren, Jamie Dimon, Christine Lagarde all conflated Bitcoin with all crypto for years. Many journalists still fail to distinguish Bitcoin from all other crypto (though the better ones are starting to).
In fact, this fallacy has been deployed for years with impunity by people who either don't know, or forgot to mention that Bitcoin has unique features making it materially different from all other crypto.
The irony is that Bitcoiners and crypto-critics are on the same page: the rugpulls, the insider enrichment, the tokens engineered to extract value from retail investors are all things that Bitcoiners like @CorySwan and other have been vocally calling out for over a decade, long before category-conflating journalists and actors from teen dramas decided they had an opinion about it.
It's not that hard
Unless you have the attention-span of a gnat-fly, you can easily do 5 mins research (AI-assisted if you really want) and discover either what the core differences are between Earth and all other planets, between Bitcoin and all other crypto.
Earth is an incredibly, uniquely habitable planet for humans to live.
Bitcoin is an incredible, uniquely suitable form of currency for humans to use.

2026-04-12 16:05:07 UTC

Thank you X for the free Nostr marketing #note1enx…afpz

2026-03-30 23:19:59 UTC

Bitcoin miners are like ants (hear me out!)
Ants eat crumbs, ie: food that humans either can't use or don't want.
Bitcoin mining works the same way. It uses surplus energy at times and places where no one else can use it: midday solar overflow, nighttime wind surplus, stranded gas in remote locations.
It doesn't compete with electricity. It eats the crumbs that no one else could use. And in the process, it makes the whole grid more efficient and more resilient.

2026-01-25 02:39:24 UTC

- reply

Brilliant

2026-01-03 01:35:51 UTC

The whole "Bitcoin uses too much energy" myth was built on an utterly false premise that environmentalists advocate for less energy use across industries.
Not true!
Very few people believe that industries should "use less energy".
The ones who do believe this are known as degrowthers, and do not represent the majority of the environmental movement.
The consensus view within mainstream environmental science and policymaking holds that labeling any large energy user as automatically harmful is reductive because it ignores critical factors:
The Energy Source: Emissions from 1 kWh of coal power and 1 kWh of wind or nuclear power are vastly different. The consensus focuses on decarbonizing the supply.
The Value and Flexibility of Demand: As discussed previously, some large loads (like certain industrial processes or data centers) can be highly flexible. This demand-side flexibility is a key asset for integrating variable renewables like wind and solar into the grid, a cornerstone of the mainstream transition plan.
Technological and Efficiency Gains: The consensus argues that innovation driven by economic activity can lead to "dematerialization", using fewer resources and less energy to produce the same or greater value.
Bitcoin mining, precisely because of its high (flexible) energy use, has been shown in multiple peer-reviewed studies to offer a number of decarbonization benefits that are extremely appealing to both environmentalists and grid operators.
These benefits include grid stabilization (Rudd et al), methane mitigation (Sechrest et al), obviation of gas peaker plants (Bruno et al), and accelerating the renewable energy transition (Lal et al, 2023). Bitcoin mining is only able to offer those benefits due to its high and flexible energy consumption pattern.
Source: https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/changing-narrative-bitcoin-mining-daniel-batten-gkmwc/
It is for this reason that a number of leading sustainability periodicals have in the last year come out in favor of Bitcoin mining’s environmental benefits.
Further, a whitepaper by Rhodes et al concluded that flexible load centers (aka: Bitcoin mining) allows grid operators to build out the grid using renewable energy, whereas inflexible load centers (AI Inference datacenters) encourage the proliferation of fossil fuel based power on the grid.

2024-03-20 22:07:31 UTC

You’ve probably seen GreenpeaceUSA's Bitcoin report by now, and my response (if you haven't been blocked).
Here’s six things that every environmentalist, Bitcoin advocate, regulator, policymaker and media representative should know about GreenpeaceUSA.
I've had this information for over a year, but have held back on going public with it until now because there were initially signs that GreenpeaceUSA would be open to engaging with environmentalists within the Bitcoin community.
With them now blocking me from commenting on their tweets, all hope of that has now ended. So here's what I can tell you about GreenpeaceUSA, and their campaign that have not been aired publicly until now, and which may surprise you.
Firstly, some context: I’m a former volunteer environmental campaigner with Greenpeace. I once risked arrest to stand up for causes I believed in, including an anti-GMO campaign against McDonalds which was successful within 6 weeks, and hailed as an example of how creative direct action can yield fast results. One of the differences: we talked to McDonalds (something no one at GreenpeaceUSA is currently doing with the Bitcoin community).
I know a number of people in the environmental movement, and I would like to thank them for their honesty in whistleblowing on a thoroughly misguided campaign from GreenpeaceUSA from start to finish.
1. GreenpeaceUSA’s campaign does NOT have the backing of Greenpeace International. In fact, other branches have asked questions of GreenpeaceUSA’s tactics, and even said that their campaign is damaging the Greenpeace brand, and has resulted in the loss of subscriptions.
2. Within GreenpeaceUSA, there are a growing number of voices of discontent. There is a growing division between some of the younger crypto-neutral or crypto-friendly millennial in their base, and the directorship of GreenpeaceUSA
3. As we know, GreenpeaceUSA did receive a $5Million donation from Ripple’s chair Chris Larsen to run an anti-Bitcoin campaign. What you probably do not know is that within Greenpeace, several staff have questioned whether this is ethical, or in the spirit of an organization that says it relies only on grassroots funding in its sign-up pledge.
4. Some members of EWG and SierraClub, particularly younger members, were not enamoured with their organization’s collusion with GreenpeaceUSA’s “Change the Code” campaign. EWG has not engaged in anti-Bitcoin rhetoric since 6 April ‘23.
5. The head of GreenpeaceUSA’s “Change the Code” campaign has stepped down and is no longer any part of GreenpeaceUSA. At the time of his stepping down he was reported by a source within GreenpeaceUSA to be questioning the wisdom of the campaign.
6. Within GreenpeaceUSA, we know from multiple inside sources that the Change the Code campaign has been widely acknowledged to have been “not particularly successful”. GreenpeaceUSA’s campaign got off on the wrong foot right from the start, by antagonising environmentalists within the Bitcoin community, such as me. Here’s its half-time report (TL;DR, the worst performing environmental campaign I’ve ever witnessed). https://bitcoinmagazine.com/culture/greenpeace-environment-attacks-help-bitcoin… Now, the campaign is in more disarray than ever, resorting to tenuous ad hominem attacks against Satoshi Action, based on the discover that one of their supporters is a climate denier. True. Well, guess what: one of their supporters is also a plant-based, tree-hugging, climate-activist & meditation teacher: me. That’s the beauty of Bitcoin: it pulls people in from across the political spectrum: we are as diverse as society itself, and that’s what makes us strong. As I wrote recently, “when the ship you’re standing on is sinking: it doesn’t matter if you’re on the left of right side of it.”
I hoped GreenpeaceUSA would end their anti-Bitcoin campaign before their credibility and relevance to the new generation of millennials they are currently disenfranchising is completely severed.
But it seems at the moment they are more intent on doubling down on misinformation. Their leadership must change for them to ever have hope of becoming a true voice for the environment again.

2024-01-16 07:36:24 UTC

New all time high
*sharing on Nostr first
Bitcoin now uses 54.5% sustainable energy, the highest of any global industry https://image.nostr.build/3d6b4832d1b05f2bbd697140a76756bf22b959122f143132833723d8ebcee8c8.jpg