If I get the suspicion that someone is slopping a #curl PR, I ask questions.
If they answer as human and explain their thoughts, this is fine. They used the LLM as a tool, but they are in charge of it. We review, they improve until it‘s accepted.
If their answer is likely from an LLM itself, we are dealing with a meatproxy („Apologies…“ etc). The chances of this PR landing become practically zero.
But I look at the idea behind the PR: was there one? Is it maybe worth doing in another way?
Stefan Eissing
npub1un…8cvec
2026-08-30 06:49:19 UTC
Author Public Key
npub1uncykwynxpfvy27vnzns7xg74fnqu2ma7mg5hrxj75dmyzph6p0s28cvecPublished at
2026-08-30 06:49:19 UTCEvent JSON
{
"id": "106ebf3d77cf129b5fbcff7a6bc5a4dc29dbb4d2c818697572cdf21fca8f6f53",
"pubkey": "e4f04b38933052c22bcc98a70f191eaa660e2b7df6d14b8cd2f51bb20837d05f",
"created_at": 1788072559,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"t",
"curl"
],
[
"proxy",
"https://chaos.social/@icing/117183123288219297",
"web"
],
[
"proxy",
"https://chaos.social/users/icing/statuses/117183123288219297",
"activitypub"
],
[
"L",
"pink.momostr"
],
[
"l",
"pink.momostr.activitypub:https://chaos.social/users/icing/statuses/117183123288219297",
"pink.momostr"
],
[
"-"
]
],
"content": "If I get the suspicion that someone is slopping a #curl PR, I ask questions.\n\nIf they answer as human and explain their thoughts, this is fine. They used the LLM as a tool, but they are in charge of it. We review, they improve until it‘s accepted.\n\nIf their answer is likely from an LLM itself, we are dealing with a meatproxy („Apologies…“ etc). The chances of this PR landing become practically zero. \n\nBut I look at the idea behind the PR: was there one? Is it maybe worth doing in another way?",
"sig": "72721b500d7fbc90a78c05d21a649f5b25cba1f2715a45bf70e364e6c00bc038dc84ea912027c417c73637c2cb537fb02b57829879393d50e6de8a049f1c15fa"
}