This all sort of highlights the point ive tried to make about trying not to skewer right wingers who are beginning to Notice™️ too hard.
People who are on board with Lowe & Co. like to take this position of "well im not jewish but I dont have anything against israel on principle, in fact I wish we could have their foreign policy here in our country".
Perhaps in the American context anything less than a total rebuke and rejection of jewish interests is just going to lead to your political vehicle being infested with hebrew nonsense, but the british zoomer right has consistently held firm their view that they dont care about israeli issues and this has obviously resulted in a public clash of interests. The Melanie Philips debacle was probably the most significant, but if this posturing about the Falklands is actually true then this will probably be an even better example of zionism and british rightism acting like oil and water. British politics doesnt have the jewish emulsifier of christian zionism and "american-israeli philanthropists" the way US politics does.
The whole spectacle and machine of US politics allows for a highly resourced and incredibly well connected network of jewish lobby groups, etc, to systematically strangle dissent and manipulate the discourse in a way that lets their Best Goys like Ted Cruz stand on a national platform and proudly state things like "i entered politics to be the number one buttgoy for Israel" and not get laughed at. It allows someone who campaigned on no new wars and bringing prices down to then launch a war of aggression for israel and send energy costs sky high and not get impeached the very next day.
But other places in the anglosphere do have the opportunity to stick to their guns on things like nativism and ethnic and demographic security without hitching their wagon to straight up antisemitism, which usually will immediately activate the eternal normie's ingrained holocaustarianism alarm. That is to say, even if someone like Rupert Lowe (or more likely whoever comes along after him) wants to serve you the "ethno-nationalist" cake without the antisemitism icing, perhaps dont turn your nose up at it immediately.
As i constantly say, the reactive deference to jewish interests in western politics is dying with the boomers and this becomes more obvious by the month at this point.
On a long enough timeline, the interests of the aloof nativist politics of, say, the English have to bump into the interests of jewish political zionism, and if that relationship continues to be oil and water then we may start seeing the relationship degrade significantly further. Remember, international jewry is a parasitic force and requires a host - and if the host refuses to allow the parasitism (regardless of whether it comes from antisemitic beliefs) then the relationship turns hostile. Like maybe, oh I dont know, supporting Argentina in a renewed dispute over the Falklands.
The number one cause of antisemitism is jewish behaviour. Or, antisemitism from first principles.
