SylvainDe

Public Key

npub1wvn2zq7f94xrxgd5lv3u32pjdjvd7tkuu6lns7432ucwy06f4f4sz79qr9

NIP-05 Address

Profile Code

nprofile1qqs8xf4pq0yj6npnyx60kg7g4qexexxl9mwwd0ec02c4wv8z8ay656cpz3mhxue69uhhyetvv9ujuerpd46hxtnfduqs6amnwvaz7tmwdaejumr0dsg2m5p7

Publishing to

relay.primal.net

Author Public Key

npub1wvn2zq7f94xrxgd5lv3u32pjdjvd7tkuu6lns7432ucwy06f4f4sz79qr9

Show more details

Last Notes

2023-09-30 12:30:29 UTC

@npub1fe8…ulxc
I live in France where we set the bar pretty high some decades ago.
The point being if we value a small footprint on the biome, there will always be mining or concrete involved so in the long run we should aim for nuclear power or even denser.
In the meantime energy efficiency and because we will need electricity anyway intermitent space intensive "renewables" will do.

2023-09-16 09:26:22 UTC

@npub1fe8…ulxc
I'd go with nuclear energy is part of the solution. 1kWh is cheaper in land usage, sand ( because less concrete per kWh ), comparable CO2 emmissions to renewables.
The smaller land footprint means more room for the biosphere, less CO2 impacts climate change and acidification positively. And it is an industry that took care of it's waste for decades.
Civilisation should try to minimize it's energy consumption too. But need some power anyway. Why not choose a low impact way to get it?