4/ some reasons why I found this talk thought-provoking:
1. there's a strand of critique of AI capacities that emphasises that they are not living organisms (e.g., to argue they don't have agency, or don't 'really' reason or 'think'), but the question there, to me, is always but what about being a living thing matters to those capacities? As Nick O'Shea himself put it, this can come periilously close to simply positing some utterly mysterious, but essential, "life force'.
highlighting the need of biological systems to simultaneously optimise both 'improvements' to capacities and required resources (e.g., metabolism) makes the role clear in ways that are relevant for thinking about concerns about AI....