buckyfonds on Nostr: ...

quoting nevent1q…elld

Thinking you need synthetic fertilizers to grow the population is akin to thinking you need to inject every human and animal with heavy metals to protect them from viruses that don't exist, so you can grow the population.

It is basically modern scientism - you need to intervene, to fix this imperfect system that was created by a coincidence.

I guess the population had a synthetic fertilizer deficiency, so they just couldn't figure out a way to thrive for the first 1800 years.

Natural fertilizers aren't scarce, especially if you don't declare war on cows, chickens, horses, etc.

I didn't post any photos of the pyramids, I posted photos of palaces that were later adapted into State Capitol buildings.

I'd imagine the people who built these and many other palaces weren't struggling for food and these buildings weren't built when the official narrative claims.

I'd assume that supplying post-reset humans with synthetic fertilizers would increase the population, yes, but I'm not sure that humans in the 1100s, 1300s, 1500s, 1600s, etc. hadn't figured out how to keep themselves fed while building these and many other palaces.

I don't know how many people we have now, but I'd assume way less than 8 billion.

I'd also be willing to bet that the graph before 1800 is complete garbage.