Your initial reply to me referenced CFAA and that the Morris Worm case made this a done deal. Let's cite someone with actual legal expertise:
"Who is liable? The Computer Fraud and Abuse Act (CFAA) requires intent—but no human at OpenAI intended to hack Hugging Face."*
That's the intent part I wrote about, and why Morris' is irrelevant since intent was clear in that case. You have then pivoted to CMA after I linked an actual discussion on the topic and try to claim that you're now winning an Internet argument.
If I link a few more things I'm sure you'll end up where I was in my first post. Your interest seems to be in being argumentative, not in fruitful discussion.
*) https://foleyhoag.com/news-and-insights/blogs/security-privacy-and-the-law/2026/july/what-the-openai-hugging-face-breach-means-for-your-organization/
Troed Sångberg
npub192…vy8wk
2026-08-06 17:23:28 UTC
in reply to nevent1q…dd5d
Author Public Key
npub192kepsf3ypyzgsds9r93amadzta0efs05ftuxhl84m04e9xxhy9qevy8wkPublished at
2026-08-06 17:23:28 UTCEvent JSON
{
"id": "2f98bc514b98e01bbe2c2b647d449f36777c149f3a60357a24af57b37272c2f8",
"pubkey": "2aad90c13120482441b028cb1eefad12fafca60fa257c35fe7aedf5c94c6b90a",
"created_at": 1786037008,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"p",
"bd6ddf63b1b899dafe542ef30153df6b2e8e830f2902fbc86918d7360dd9157b"
],
[
"e",
"3b4f005525879910b7b8a15ff37fbd6e8f54fb279be8cbfd9fe00b9c86c5c514",
"",
"root",
"1915bc3488de389cecb12727ac019f3834ec901d38924e374483edc20fc1ef73"
],
[
"proxy",
"https://swecyb.com/@troed/117049721365280847",
"web"
],
[
"e",
"b848ff7d470fc13c42144a73a6a8f9aae78d3fd653400fd81dc3fa41f8a9eccd",
"",
"reply",
"bd6ddf63b1b899dafe542ef30153df6b2e8e830f2902fbc86918d7360dd9157b"
],
[
"p",
"1915bc3488de389cecb12727ac019f3834ec901d38924e374483edc20fc1ef73"
],
[
"p",
"2aad90c13120482441b028cb1eefad12fafca60fa257c35fe7aedf5c94c6b90a"
],
[
"proxy",
"https://swecyb.com/users/troed/statuses/117049721365280847",
"activitypub"
],
[
"L",
"pink.momostr"
],
[
"l",
"pink.momostr.activitypub:https://swecyb.com/users/troed/statuses/117049721365280847",
"pink.momostr"
],
[
"-"
]
],
"content": "Your initial reply to me referenced CFAA and that the Morris Worm case made this a done deal. Let's cite someone with actual legal expertise:\n\n\"Who is liable? The Computer Fraud and Abuse Act (CFAA) requires intent—but no human at OpenAI intended to hack Hugging Face.\"*\n\nThat's the intent part I wrote about, and why Morris' is irrelevant since intent was clear in that case. You have then pivoted to CMA after I linked an actual discussion on the topic and try to claim that you're now winning an Internet argument.\n\nIf I link a few more things I'm sure you'll end up where I was in my first post. Your interest seems to be in being argumentative, not in fruitful discussion.\n\n*) https://foleyhoag.com/news-and-insights/blogs/security-privacy-and-the-law/2026/july/what-the-openai-hugging-face-breach-means-for-your-organization/",
"sig": "bdf6d85fbb61a2218bbf322e6e8011e3606e112057d777423de32ebcde84ad0c8643a4c05d7c8db33497ffadd4d55a2f7e3ad031ce0363aeae9fe080d7fdc139"
}