Event JSON
{
"id": "2eccb84b7f3c5cd7e2ad947398c64b16509ba792109487fbd90000f1a4906c58",
"pubkey": "5465a13741a37f08812ac77316880b1a3e5605a5aaa40d2327feb6e1fb7c210e",
"created_at": 1778659237,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"alt",
"A short note: Self-custody is becoming a bigger conversation in ..."
],
[
"t",
"Bitcoin"
],
[
"t",
"bitcoin"
],
[
"t",
"SelfCustody"
],
[
"t",
"selfcustody"
],
[
"t",
"SelfSovereignty"
],
[
"t",
"selfsovereignty"
],
[
"t",
"Privacy"
],
[
"t",
"privacy"
],
[
"t",
"Freedom"
],
[
"t",
"freedom"
],
[
"t",
"Decentralisation"
],
[
"t",
"decentralisation"
],
[
"r",
"https://bitcoinmagazine.com/news/bitcoin-self-custody-framed-civil-liberty"
],
[
"client",
"Amethyst"
]
],
"content": "Self-custody is becoming a bigger conversation in Bitcoin, and not just among Bitcoiners.\n\nAt Bitcoin 2026, speakers including Joe Kelly and Congressman Nick Begich argued that self-custody should be treated as a civil liberty, linking private keys directly to financial sovereignty and personal freedom.\n\nThe argument is simple: if you do not control the keys, you do not fully control the money.\n\nRead link below:\nhttps://bitcoinmagazine.com/news/bitcoin-self-custody-framed-civil-liberty\n\nShould self-custody protections be treated as a basic digital right?\n\n#Bitcoin #SelfCustody #SelfSovereignty #Privacy #Freedom #Decentralisation",
"sig": "fa719ff76f3efeec4e92d38e8586380575ef06377f939b20ea2936d901a2cd3ff3e964fd91ad19aea9b37b993338249f5e64d68bd1a215840a3f1bf1081cdc5e"
}