Maija Spergia Maijiņa on Nostr: nprofile1q…pd73q Fedi Developer (of crushes) :flag: :cute__i: So? Genuinelly whats ...

nprofile1qy2hwumn8ghj7un9d3shjtnyd968gmewwp6kyqpqufmlneg8tt9jwvk6p40t02lxhmkns6zlpu4cwrvxerczdnn4syzq4pd73q (nprofile…d73q) Fedi Developer (of crushes) :flag: :cute__i: (nprofile…y6jc) So? Genuinelly whats the problem with that? Not all would oblige, and it doesn't matter anyways, it's intentionally weak, documented as such, trivially easy to break, and it will have exactly the same copyright protections with or without the DRM. Literally changes nothing in practice except an extra little step. If you're consuming proprietary games anyways, whether or not you have to run a quick tool to strip the drm which will never improve and actually work as drm does not matter. You're position is less rational to me than stallman worshippers like suiseiseki, it doesn't make any sense. Wouldn't you be against DRM for what it does, not just for something that intentionally fails at doing that technically falling under the classification? For any practicality, it is not DRM, it's only a technicality that shouldn't matter. And do you really think the few publishers who demanded some kind of builtin DRM to release it wouldn't just release it elsewhere with worse real DRM if they were told no? They wouldn't be refusing to publish without it otherwise, be happy some extra games got made available with a fake DRM you can easily trivially break. You're simultaneouely dogmatic about technical definitions of things that don't have the problems you're disliking the category for, while also throwing out dogma and giving up on your principles to play propretary games and just not caring about the assets for some reason. It feels hypocritical, and this kind of thinking doesn't make sense to my brain. I can't make sense of it, I can't understand it. My only conclusion I can draw from this is that your are deranged and probably have a cluster A personality disorder. I don't understand you, at all.