Join Nostr
2025-12-29 19:08:39 UTC
in reply to

Owen Lynch on Nostr: nprofile1q…4rrqe These are all good points. I think the real question for me is how ...

These are all good points.

I think the real question for me is how this effects my term/type *syntax*. E.g. now that (concrete syntax identifiers) can refer either to an element of a type or a proper judgment, should I have two mutually recursive syntax trees that I elaborate into or just one? And should syn/chk return a sum type between them?

Perhaps they really should be distinguished in the concrete syntax for clarity...