Event JSON
{
"id": "463def7914dbe7fd19a41249372602d797650331e2598327cc1fcdd3b3b34b6a",
"pubkey": "0a7b300fbfc9fbc719e103d0725591d19df6070df095e399af6aff6354cf9b41",
"created_at": 1792772863,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"t",
"Campaigns/Elections"
],
[
"t",
"Censorship"
],
[
"t",
"Journalism"
],
[
"t",
"Politics"
],
[
"t",
"Social Media"
],
[
"t",
"FCC"
],
[
"t",
"Internet"
],
[
"t",
"Media"
],
[
"t",
"Polls"
],
[
"proxy",
"https://reason.com/feed/#https%3A%2F%2Freason.com%2F2026%2F10%2F23%2Fworst-nathan-for-you-style-scheme-ever-a-polling-company-claimed-its-fake-polls-were-a-social-experiment%2F",
"rss"
]
],
"content": "Worst Nathan for You–Style Scheme Ever? A Polling Company Claimed Its Fake Polls Were a Social Experiment.\n\nInformation regulation is not the way to stop online hoaxes. But that doesn’t mean we should stop searching for the truth.\n\nhttps://reason.com/2026/10/23/worst-nathan-for-you-style-scheme-ever-a-polling-company-claimed-its-fake-polls-were-a-social-experiment/",
"sig": "94acec888410077c908b0760fc3d8cbca14b30778cc343dc7dff2eebe48bc7616a6b63ff862ccd2276c74d8d01e265c04ca69e08f9967483ca221337599bc208"
}