Profoundly Nerdy on Nostr: Were there 8-bit processors with significantly more than 64kB of directly addressable ...
Were there 8-bit processors with significantly more than 64kB of directly addressable RAM back in the day? I'm not counting bank switching. Bonus if the thing had a hardware stack (or two) that could be relocated.
#retrocomputing #programming
Published at
2024-12-13 13:31:22 UTCEvent JSON
{
"id": "4f211a2e9d78a0d8dfd0587c783fd717b1fc4e3a207e0567c67ced14ee3dd56f",
"pubkey": "473db265af67c79a31f78d116c0a0d1bac8860faa5e0a50e2cc234329e90040e",
"created_at": 1734096682,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"proxy",
"https://bitbang.social/@profoundlynerdy/113645760178712678",
"web"
],
[
"t",
"retrocomputing"
],
[
"t",
"programming"
],
[
"proxy",
"https://bitbang.social/users/profoundlynerdy/statuses/113645760178712678",
"activitypub"
],
[
"L",
"pink.momostr"
],
[
"l",
"pink.momostr.activitypub:https://bitbang.social/users/profoundlynerdy/statuses/113645760178712678",
"pink.momostr"
],
[
"-"
]
],
"content": "Were there 8-bit processors with significantly more than 64kB of directly addressable RAM back in the day? I'm not counting bank switching. Bonus if the thing had a hardware stack (or two) that could be relocated.\n\n#retrocomputing #programming",
"sig": "a1f94e359c50bb34d570a51f86f789ccc97ed49067283e1969eedc8aea7a1502c9aa5548fda63216c40766a9182fcdf67f52e53eb751da87946c1d599c680f66"
}