nprofile1qyt8wumn8ghj7un9d3shjtnyd968gmewwp6kytcqyqje45r60d95lp47ls8uaxwr00jadzjstjr0fhx4xt8rvw7q65chclxxlvy (nprofile…xlvy) nprofile1qyt8wumn8ghj7un9d3shjtnyd968gmewwp6kytcqypc5pt4qanr9sujmrcyuvujuwdlehcd9skqz7wma25jajqtchdt36g7cut4 (nprofile…cut4) nprofile1qyt8wumn8ghj7un9d3shjtnyd968gmewwp6kytcqyq8vwcr8ksayauvpe7xplaeu7843lkwghasr3haezwv52fdl9z2egm0g8ch (nprofile…g8ch) When I saw what the research was for, I thought maybe the image was supposed to be an example of poor existing AI support, but no, it’s intended as an infographic that explains the framework defined in the paper.
“Fig. 1. Overall working of the framework presented as an infographic.”
Nature should retract it. Not only is part (all?) of it generated by AI, but it’s not been proofread by the authors themselves. Very sloppy.