Niklas :linux: :debian: :ruby: :vegan: on Nostr: I feel the same. Another thing that I've noticed is how PR descriptions have gotten ...

I feel the same.

Another thing that I've noticed is how PR descriptions have gotten longer as people start using LLMs, and they have become less useful in the process.

I believe the logic is: a good PR description is long and detailed, to make it easier on the reviewer.
In reality though, the description ends up containing a lot of unnecessary fluff, and makes it *harder* for me to review.

A single sentence by a human, pointing me to the one or two things to look out for / that aren't obvious are a lot more helpful than a long text, which recaps all the changes that the PR contains.