W.W. CARGILL CO. v. STATE OF MINNESOTA, 180, U.S. 452 (1901) 180 U.S. 452 “The acceptance of a license, in whatever form, will not impose upon the licensee an obligation to respect or to comply with any provisions of the statute or with the regulations prescribed that are repugnant to the Constitution of the United States.”
Marbury v. Madison, 5 US (2 Cranch) 137, 174, 176, (1803) “All laws, rules, and practices which are repugnant to the Constitution are null and void.”
“No one is bound to obey an unconstitutional law and no courts are bound to enforce it.” 16 Am. Jur. Sec. 177 late 2nd, Sec 256
Licensing Liberty: “No state shall convert a liberty into a license, and charge a fee therefore.” (Murdock v. Pennsylvania, 319 U.S. 105)
“If the States convert a right (liberty) into a privilege, the Citizen can ignore the license and fee and engage in the right (liberty) with impunity.” (Shuttlesworth v. City of Birmingham, Alabama, 373 U.S. 262)
Hurtado v. California, 110 U.S. 516 .“The State cannot diminish rights of the People.”
Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436 (1966) “Where rights secured by the Constitution are involved, there can be no rule-making or legislation which would abrogate them.
Bad Elk v. United States, 177 U.S. 529 (1900), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that an individual had the right to use force to resist an unlawful arrest and was entitled to a jury instruction to that effect.
No matter that most sheep believe that the government has the authority to do whatever, and that blind obedience to authority, NO...Today's "government" has abridged and ignored the constitution to the point that the government itself is illegal, immoral, unconstitutional, and nothing more than organized crime, using extortion and a protection racket to bleed the people dry, and today's cops are actually NOT the good guys, but are nothing but street-level thugs facilitating the extortion of the people...
https://cdn.minds.com/fs/v1/thumbnail/1810992912511537152/xlarge/
N.Morgan
npub1d6…hd206
2025-09-06 09:22:37 UTC
Author Public Key
npub1d69cfg0049ed9cr8mxhndzvfd5f4s2j9h0wxy5qtkkpewyrtlccq9hd206Seen on
wss://relay.momostr.pinkPublished at
2025-09-06 09:22:37 UTCEvent JSON
{
"id": "60ca831ace480f6f5f3ff404823e2ece0f0090bcc8d970a2a83c96f3fbb2e6e0",
"pubkey": "6e8b84a1efa972d2e067d9af3689896d13582a45bbdc62500bb58397106bfe30",
"created_at": 1757150557,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"imeta",
"url https://cdn.minds.com/fs/v1/thumbnail/1810992912511537152/xlarge/",
"m image/jpeg"
],
[
"proxy",
"https://www.minds.com/newsfeed/1810993752701931520",
"web"
],
[
"proxy",
"https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/458092138547122176/entities/urn:activity:1810993752701931520",
"activitypub"
],
[
"L",
"pink.momostr"
],
[
"l",
"pink.momostr.activitypub:https://www.minds.com/api/activitypub/users/458092138547122176/entities/urn:activity:1810993752701931520",
"pink.momostr"
],
[
"-"
]
],
"content": "W.W. CARGILL CO. v. STATE OF MINNESOTA, 180, U.S. 452 (1901) 180 U.S. 452 “The acceptance of a license, in whatever form, will not impose upon the licensee an obligation to respect or to comply with any provisions of the statute or with the regulations prescribed that are repugnant to the Constitution of the United States.”\n\nMarbury v. Madison, 5 US (2 Cranch) 137, 174, 176, (1803) “All laws, rules, and practices which are repugnant to the Constitution are null and void.”\n\n“No one is bound to obey an unconstitutional law and no courts are bound to enforce it.” 16 Am. Jur. Sec. 177 late 2nd, Sec 256\n\nLicensing Liberty: “No state shall convert a liberty into a license, and charge a fee therefore.” (Murdock v. Pennsylvania, 319 U.S. 105)\n\n“If the States convert a right (liberty) into a privilege, the Citizen can ignore the license and fee and engage in the right (liberty) with impunity.” (Shuttlesworth v. City of Birmingham, Alabama, 373 U.S. 262)\n\nHurtado v. California, 110 U.S. 516 .“The State cannot diminish rights of the People.”\n\nMiranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436 (1966) “Where rights secured by the Constitution are involved, there can be no rule-making or legislation which would abrogate them.\n\nBad Elk v. United States, 177 U.S. 529 (1900), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that an individual had the right to use force to resist an unlawful arrest and was entitled to a jury instruction to that effect.\n\nNo matter that most sheep believe that the government has the authority to do whatever, and that blind obedience to authority, NO...Today's \"government\" has abridged and ignored the constitution to the point that the government itself is illegal, immoral, unconstitutional, and nothing more than organized crime, using extortion and a protection racket to bleed the people dry, and today's cops are actually NOT the good guys, but are nothing but street-level thugs facilitating the extortion of the people... \nhttps://cdn.minds.com/fs/v1/thumbnail/1810992912511537152/xlarge/\n",
"sig": "5861f68a123009e48ba84e2051981c46494c7a674e7ad191aa74b970a26ca9dd14adac34f84fd116a0372900012ffec777ab7baf6e91235295df90081de85330"
}