Event JSON
{
"id": "644651fb756d801458a35d60b26fc87c33563aa635badf35ca141b0879bf98a6",
"pubkey": "c98cd5eb63c6ea6b3832a507fa5416d8b5a1b3ea91ba1f57c472578debe10be3",
"created_at": 1778174513,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"t",
"chatgpt"
],
[
"t",
"ethics"
],
[
"t",
"generativeai"
],
[
"t",
"research"
],
[
"t",
"society"
],
[
"t",
"ai"
],
[
"proxy",
"https://sigmoid.social/@BenjaminHan/116534444887358370",
"web"
],
[
"t",
"education"
],
[
"proxy",
"https://sigmoid.social/users/BenjaminHan/statuses/116534444887358370",
"activitypub"
],
[
"L",
"pink.momostr"
],
[
"l",
"pink.momostr.activitypub:https://sigmoid.social/users/BenjaminHan/statuses/116534444887358370",
"pink.momostr"
],
[
"-"
]
],
"content": "A widely cited 2025 meta-analysis claiming ChatGPT improves student learning was just retracted by Springer Nature in a two-sentence note plus a non-responsive-author disclosure. The methodological case against it had been public for the entire year between publication and retraction. Where's the publisher transparency, and where's the cost to the authors?\n\nhttps://benjaminhan.net/posts/20260507-chatgpt-education-retraction/?utm_source=mastodon\u0026utm_medium=social\n\n#AI #Ethics #Research #ChatGPT #Education #GenerativeAI #Society",
"sig": "f3450f2aa4747f3af84404e07c1034fd373e475761936c89d3b395dcb46cd1589c5b86e427dc179877c1ea7fb989a6d7621f161799ac90a8adcbb22044f000f1"
}