sarah jeong on Nostr: maybe lawsky has discussed this before — but are there any other instances in which ...
maybe lawsky has discussed this before — but are there any other instances in which a specific scotus justice's name became a term of art, the way it has with "kavanaugh stop"? there are countless examples where a case caption becomes a name ("miranda rights") but justice's name seems uncommon.
Published at
2025-12-23 20:33:18 UTCEvent JSON
{
"id": "e651d8d3b2283aa55f5e324678869a4d9f72aa9b85ac7e21ab9f75af8aa0f626",
"pubkey": "3c4cfcf6afbbe9895d39771f4e38321da062c180bfed4d73a6e7efd0ab8d9403",
"created_at": 1766521998,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"proxy",
"https://bsky.brid.gy/convert/ap/at://did:plc:4t2ziwnnescprzorvmrfduey/app.bsky.feed.post/3maolu5sycc23",
"activitypub"
],
[
"client",
"Mostr",
"31990:6be38f8c63df7dbf84db7ec4a6e6fbbd8d19dca3b980efad18585c46f04b26f9:mostr",
"wss://relay.ditto.pub/"
]
],
"content": "maybe lawsky has discussed this before — but are there any other instances in which a specific scotus justice's name became a term of art, the way it has with \"kavanaugh stop\"? there are countless examples where a case caption becomes a name (\"miranda rights\") but justice's name seems uncommon.",
"sig": "920354cd17671ab55057d42e6e859a517195afb499e5da74a7970d21091083724a038444493a802a71ab6fb10dfa30b820db8cf006c1662f674b1b466bb04003"
}