nprofile1qy2hwumn8ghj7un9d3shjtnyd968gmewwp6kyqpqd4wywmkfcegmw55el4g66ha4rrffxrp4rrs8uke38rzqca9gft2qfx6g3g (nprofile…6g3g) I wonder if instead there's some ulterior motive here. Perhaps senior management wants to re-focus the university as well as save money, which makes voluntary redundancies a way to achieve both. They can pick who they let go.
If it was just about saving some money in the short-term, when our student enrolments are historically high, then losing this many staff and institutional expertise seems counterproductive.
(I don't like it either way.)