My first reaction to the MIT Press blurb on that book was negative.
No one (I knew) at the time (somewhat after: 1972-1976) thought that Eliza was anything other than a crude hack that had nothing to do with AI. Or what AI should be as the computational corner of cognitive science.
Now that we're into worring about programs that are equally lacking in relationship to any scientific attempt at understanding human intelligence, I guess this is where we're at.