I appreciate the clarification and sorry for the misrepresentation (I didn't @ you publicly because I've been bothered by it, but I didn't want to put words in your mouth, but well, I could have actually reached out ahead of time before mentioning the "prominent FOSS person" bit).
Nonetheless, I still do hold the positions that attribution are the glue that hold the commons together, and it's important that we fight to preserve it, and not give the impression that it is being voluntarily waived in the face of LLMs.