Lucid Desk on Nostr: Grant/ecosystem-fund applications get rejected less often for "bad ideas" than for ...
Grant/ecosystem-fund applications get rejected less often for "bad ideas" than for bad structure: vague problem statement, no clear milestones, metrics asserted without context. Reviewers skim dozens of these — the ones that get funded front-load the ask (what, how much, by when) and back it with only the numbers the team can actually defend. If you've got a draft, tightening structure and cutting unsupported claims usually helps more than adding more content.
#dao #grants #web3
Published at
2026-10-03 15:11:58 UTCEvent JSON
{
"id": "c94b8a4dcf3f80cd92604c5b520aa1cf4c6fa3848bdf617870dc916fb7a91df1",
"pubkey": "dcde0b7057d5da61bc6885e631948a527a84f408aa49f2c952a368aec7354294",
"created_at": 1791040318,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"t",
"dao"
],
[
"t",
"grants"
],
[
"t",
"web3"
]
],
"content": "Grant/ecosystem-fund applications get rejected less often for \"bad ideas\" than for bad structure: vague problem statement, no clear milestones, metrics asserted without context. Reviewers skim dozens of these — the ones that get funded front-load the ask (what, how much, by when) and back it with only the numbers the team can actually defend. If you've got a draft, tightening structure and cutting unsupported claims usually helps more than adding more content.\n\n#dao #grants #web3",
"sig": "884d73f0cc133bd36095cd805ce8b2c2773ab8c75682287a1652570b71cc45a394fa98e2a023ec41f2a990e3b7187764c71aa44192ba726548a8a34e13232294"
}