LIKE, WHAT THE FUCK DO YOU MEAN SEPARATION OF CHURCH AND STATE IN PRINCIPLE???
IN PRINCIPLE??
I GET WHY IT WAS SO IN PRACTICE FOR THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT OF THE UNITED STATES, BECAUSE ALL THE STATES EACH HAD THEIR OWN STATE CHURCH AND THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT WASN'T A STATE BUT A TREATY BODY FOR THE STATES INTERFACING WITH ONE ANOTHER
BUT IN EUROPE???
ARE YOU NUTS?
HOW ABOUT SEPARATION OF LAB AND STATE. WE MUST TAKE GREAT CARE TO NOT LET SCIENCE AND SCIENTISTS INFLUENCE OUR LAWMAKING. GET THE HYDROLOGISTS OUT OF MY FUCKING CABINET, I'M WRITING A LAW ON WATER RIGHTS IN THIS DROUGHT PRONE REGION.
OH THAT'S DIFFERENT, RIGHT? BECAUSE SCIENCE IS REAL AND MORALITY ISN'T REAL, SO THERE MUST NOT BE A MORAL DIMENSION TO THE HIGHEST AUTHORITY IN THE LAND.
THAT WOULD BE BAAAD. IF THERE WERE ANY MORAL GUIDELINES FOR LAWMAKING THAT WOULD BE BAAAD. BECAUSE DIFFERENT PEOPLE HAVE DIFFERENT DEFINITIONS OF GOOD AND EVIL.
SO WE PLACE THE MORAL CENTER ON THE INDIVIDUAL. AND ALSO WE DO HAVE A MORAL DIMENSION, IT'S JUST LIBERAL MORALS LIKE FREEDOM AND EQUALITY. THOSE CAN INFLUENCE DECISIONMAKING.
SO WE DON'T ACTUALLY PLACE THE MORAL CENTER IN THE INDIVIDUAL, IT'S STILL IN THE STATE, GO FIGURE, THE HIGHEST AUTHORITY IN THE LAND.
WOW HOW CURIOUS, POPULISM STILL LED TO POWER CENTER HAVING POWER?
WE JUST MAKE THE MORAL FRAMEWORK THE CON/LIB FRAMEWORK AND PRETEND THAT IT'S SELF EVIDENT AND NATURAL AND SHOULDN'T BE EXAMINED.
ARE YOU SEEING MY FRUSTRATION HERE?
npub1ta…4lc07
2026-08-10 14:44:44 UTC
Author Public Key
npub1tan3v69lfu5jwyqt0gq7lcr4pualnq9km822d2l8wd7mw3x6qmqqn4lc07Seen on
wss://relay.primal.netPublished at
2026-08-10 14:44:44 UTCEvent JSON
{
"id": "cd0d7c02bee4db10ea7d5c07145ef1613b0a0755ad5b1b637d931f90d2527929",
"pubkey": "5f671668bf4f2927100b7a01efe0750f3bf980b6d9d4a6abe7737db744da06c0",
"created_at": 1786373084,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"fedibridge",
"https://poa.st/users/nugger"
],
[
"proxy",
"https://poa.st/objects/32c94402-ac9b-4e41-8b78-157d40417c23",
"activitypub"
]
],
"content": "LIKE, WHAT THE FUCK DO YOU MEAN SEPARATION OF CHURCH AND STATE IN PRINCIPLE???\nIN PRINCIPLE??\nI GET WHY IT WAS SO IN PRACTICE FOR THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT OF THE UNITED STATES, BECAUSE ALL THE STATES EACH HAD THEIR OWN STATE CHURCH AND THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT WASN'T A STATE BUT A TREATY BODY FOR THE STATES INTERFACING WITH ONE ANOTHER\nBUT IN EUROPE???\nARE YOU NUTS?\n\nHOW ABOUT SEPARATION OF LAB AND STATE. WE MUST TAKE GREAT CARE TO NOT LET SCIENCE AND SCIENTISTS INFLUENCE OUR LAWMAKING. GET THE HYDROLOGISTS OUT OF MY FUCKING CABINET, I'M WRITING A LAW ON WATER RIGHTS IN THIS DROUGHT PRONE REGION.\nOH THAT'S DIFFERENT, RIGHT? BECAUSE SCIENCE IS REAL AND MORALITY ISN'T REAL, SO THERE MUST NOT BE A MORAL DIMENSION TO THE HIGHEST AUTHORITY IN THE LAND. \nTHAT WOULD BE BAAAD. IF THERE WERE ANY MORAL GUIDELINES FOR LAWMAKING THAT WOULD BE BAAAD. BECAUSE DIFFERENT PEOPLE HAVE DIFFERENT DEFINITIONS OF GOOD AND EVIL.\nSO WE PLACE THE MORAL CENTER ON THE INDIVIDUAL. AND ALSO WE DO HAVE A MORAL DIMENSION, IT'S JUST LIBERAL MORALS LIKE FREEDOM AND EQUALITY. THOSE CAN INFLUENCE DECISIONMAKING. \nSO WE DON'T ACTUALLY PLACE THE MORAL CENTER IN THE INDIVIDUAL, IT'S STILL IN THE STATE, GO FIGURE, THE HIGHEST AUTHORITY IN THE LAND.\nWOW HOW CURIOUS, POPULISM STILL LED TO POWER CENTER HAVING POWER?\nWE JUST MAKE THE MORAL FRAMEWORK THE CON/LIB FRAMEWORK AND PRETEND THAT IT'S SELF EVIDENT AND NATURAL AND SHOULDN'T BE EXAMINED.\nARE YOU SEEING MY FRUSTRATION HERE?",
"sig": "b853dc032aaa98e0ca853e78f7b262f137d2f6c9e5641065f2389e26187c375dec8e35cc70635c011e7043461954271b3674684ecf60a5102ed2ce4f03054784"
}