Join Nostr
2025-12-19 20:47:01 UTC

Grégoire Locqueville on Nostr: A nice, concise definition of the trace, which makes it look a little less ...

A nice, concise definition of the trace, which makes it look a little less arbitrary-looking (if a little more technical) than the standard definition "the sum of elements on the diagonal", and also makes it more evident that it doesn't depend on the choice of coordinates:

The trace is the only linear mapping¹ such that:
trace(|u><v|) = <u|v>
for any vectors |u>, |v>.

(The <|> things are bracket notation: |u> stands for a regular vector (think "column vector"), <u|, for its corresponding dual vector (think "row vector"), |u><v| for the tensor product of |u> and |v>, and <u|v> to their dot product)

This still has the drawback of looking like it depends on a choice of inner product, when it actually doesn't.

¹ From linear mappings from V to V, to the scale field K.