Join Nostr
2026-10-05 11:16:44 UTC
in reply to

Caleb James DeLisle on Nostr: Another chemistry that is potentially interesting is: FeCl₂​ + 2NaOH → ...

Another chemistry that is potentially interesting is:

FeCl₂​ + 2NaOH → Fe(OH)₂ ​+ 2NaCl

Turning FeCl₂ into Fe(OH)₂ yields 51wh/mole, while turning NaOH into NaCl yields about 2wh/mol, and importantly we're not requiring H2O to participate.

A challenge with this chemistry is in the Fe(OH)₂ will turn into Fe(OH)₃ when exposed to air. But one could still de-water it in nitrogen, or just keep it under water.

Interestingly, FeCl₂​, NaOH, Fe(OH)₂, and NaCl can all be reasonably precipitated out of the water as solids. If we push the reaction until they precipitate, we don't necessarily need to worry about concentrations in water.

Solid concentrations are:
NaCl -> 37mol/liter
NaOH -> 53mol/liter
Fe(OH)₂ -> 40mol/liter
FeCl₂ -> 12mol/liter (approx)

So if we're storing solids then:
1 liter of FeCl₂ requires 0.45 liter of NaOH and makes 0.3 liters of Fe(OH)₂ and 0.64 liters of NaCl, and this stores about 630wh of energy.

If we want to store everything as a sludge in 25% water, we keep all of the numbers the same but reduce the energy storage by 1/4.

Conservatively, we might think about storing 0.5kwh per 3 liters of tanks. So similarly to the other reactions, we're in the same ball park of 3 cubic meters of materials storing 100kWh.

But these materials are quite a bit safer. Note: There are no papers I could find on this exact reaction, so there might be something fatally flawed with it that I'm not thinking of...