Nick on Nostr: nprofile1q…5m2ru I agree that highly secure systems have been shielded against RF ...

nprofile1qy2hwumn8ghj7un9d3shjtnddaehgu3wwp6kyqpquhnx67vlf04mwtt7qrjyx47gpmtf3twz4nrfmx9lspw6rrv5gkhss5m2ru (nprofile…m2ru) I agree that highly secure systems have been shielded against RF for very long time, I guess TEMPEST security was a concern as far back as WWII. So arguably "air-gapped" was always a poor descriptor, but it seems more absurd to me now that RF is not just a potential side channel that could leak a little information but rather one of the main ways computers interface.