This is not meant as a jab toward Devon Stack or those who want to do purity spiraling. It may be what you want to do, and that's fine. The borders of the group we identify as are always subject to personal preferences and argumentation.
However, the argument is an ad hominem. What does it change if all the statements below were true? It would simply mean that the carrier of the ideas is one way or another. This would tell us nothing about the validity or even strategic value of the ideas.
Secondly, realize the limited utility of the argument at this level of purity. What are we saying, here, that Nick wouldn't be allowed in a White ethnostate with 80% Italian ancestry? What purpose does this argument serve?
I think the purpose would be limited to extremely restricted clubs and limited social circles. I do not see it as productive for a broader public conversation since there is no solution to satisfy someone making a comment like that of Devin. What would that solution look like, deport Fuentes? Cancel him by race?
https://bird.makeup/users/black_pilled/statuses/2055722789735399604
My favorite truth about race is that nick is 0% related to my ancestors (or any founding stock Americans) and that people like Benjamin Franklin wouldn’t consider him white at all but rather a mongrel abomination, the product of swarthy mud people rutting in the shallow end of the gene pool.