Elena Brescacin on Nostr: Fortunately someone is talking about smart glasses and blind people, in mainstream ...
Fortunately someone is talking about smart glasses and blind people, in mainstream media. This matter must be taken seriously.
Today I quoted someone who said "no one worries so much of camera equipped phones" but about glasses, there is a huge difference: glasses can be kept always on, with camera recording. Take a pic and film someone is matter of a second.
But the message that has not passed, is that they are not spying/recording by default (or the battery would be drained).
I have tried them with an app called "scribe me" yesterday, with a live assistant describing objects around me. And, having video always on, drains the battery drastically. That's why I find NO SENSE in keeping them always turned on! Can I say that paradoxically I feel more scared by extreme anti-glasses movement, than about glasses themselves?
Being protecting and defending our privacy is a duty. But, it would be better done being aggressive towards the companies, claiming more privacy respect, not against single users making their lives impossible. Banning glasses from school, for example, is a barrier against blind students (and teachers).
We need more protection, we ask it.
Blind and visually impaired people fear smart glasses backlash
https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cmx2qlz7ney2oPublished at
2026-10-10 19:51:35 UTCEvent JSON
{
"id": "3b9dcab54dde1acf233b902e19cb27cd1c50d9ff9072fe789fab9500ce50f886",
"pubkey": "2082d48af1fc37ad08d6fce90f210130231a3fb27c58d6601eb7d2fc7e67b087",
"created_at": 1791661895,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"proxy",
"https://poliversity.it/@elettrona/117418353993834814",
"web"
],
[
"proxy",
"https://poliversity.it/users/elettrona/statuses/117418353993834814",
"activitypub"
],
[
"L",
"pink.momostr"
],
[
"l",
"pink.momostr.activitypub:https://poliversity.it/users/elettrona/statuses/117418353993834814",
"pink.momostr"
],
[
"-"
]
],
"content": "Fortunately someone is talking about smart glasses and blind people, in mainstream media. This matter must be taken seriously.\n\nToday I quoted someone who said \"no one worries so much of camera equipped phones\" but about glasses, there is a huge difference: glasses can be kept always on, with camera recording. Take a pic and film someone is matter of a second. \n\nBut the message that has not passed, is that they are not spying/recording by default (or the battery would be drained).\n\nI have tried them with an app called \"scribe me\" yesterday, with a live assistant describing objects around me. And, having video always on, drains the battery drastically. That's why I find NO SENSE in keeping them always turned on! Can I say that paradoxically I feel more scared by extreme anti-glasses movement, than about glasses themselves? \n\nBeing protecting and defending our privacy is a duty. But, it would be better done being aggressive towards the companies, claiming more privacy respect, not against single users making their lives impossible. Banning glasses from school, for example, is a barrier against blind students (and teachers). \n\nWe need more protection, we ask it.\nBlind and visually impaired people fear smart glasses backlash https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cmx2qlz7ney2o",
"sig": "524d9ec1d45769708756357d772309da771af47434e6262e2200fe607071865fdfbe6bdade43802b470196d2499558179fade9ddbba6a70622ee9adf16e08dd0"
}