Event JSON
{
"id": "3af36f43a21169f975bf5dfc57450626f4779671f4293778c7d1042ea6319b2d",
"pubkey": "9a9937b7de59afd6e6232521c6b2fe5158ab0b619d1d64d6c8a18c06a3d24815",
"created_at": 1759018330,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"t",
"staredecisis"
],
[
"t",
"courts"
],
[
"t",
"precedent"
],
[
"t",
"supremecourt"
],
[
"t",
"legal"
],
[
"t",
"clarencethomas"
],
[
"t",
"law"
],
[
"proxy",
"https://newsie.social/@bespacific/115279025276457845",
"web"
],
[
"proxy",
"https://newsie.social/users/bespacific/statuses/115279025276457845",
"activitypub"
],
[
"L",
"pink.momostr"
],
[
"l",
"pink.momostr.activitypub:https://newsie.social/users/bespacific/statuses/115279025276457845",
"pink.momostr"
],
[
"-"
]
],
"content": "Speaking @ Catholic Univ School of Law in DC #ClarenceThomas argued that #SupremeCourt should rethink the way #law is interpreted as it relates 2 #staredecisis, the #legal doctrine that suggests #courts should follow #legal #precedent or prior decisions when making rulings on similar legal matters. \"At some point we need to think about what we're doing w stare decisis..And it's not some sort of talismanic deal where you can just say 'stare decisis' and not think, turn off the brain, right?\" 1/",
"sig": "3da66d16c9733b78a5f5ff65f3a7d221be601a8adc945911fd1085ec22b0ffe61c775c8ebbd49fc740cfe3c46bafb93f788570a2d6e2a25a35997f7594d6eac3"
}