Do you at least agree, that extreme situations, like earthquakes (as in Venezuela or Colombia recently), floods (as in Nepal) or Zunamis like the one in Fukushima cause a huge destruction. So the loss of value is inherently created naturally.
We live in a world, where it is normal, that nature destroys stuff, takes live and makes total worldwide wealth shrink.
Just the same way illnesses are very powerful natural desasters, which can lower health of thousands of people and in extreme cases kill us.
When such a natural disaster takes place, what is the first priority?
Is it to help fast and focus on the people, where lives can be saved? Is the main concern to negociate best prices? I assume you know the mechanics of markets? When demand spikes and production didlnot have yet time to adapt to the demand, high prices are a natural result. The most expected result.
You state quiet a lot of extreme positions. You state interventions (as isolation and keeping distance) as propaganda.
When you call it propaganda, do you assume, that viruses can spread equally fast independent of how many people meet eachother, how close they are to eachother or if they use protection like masks?
Since these interventions stand on very strong logic explanations, that one can even explain to children. No doctor title needed to understand their efficiancy in lowering infectionrate.
Could you might propose some alternative behavior, you would applaud people? The behavior you would have really liked to see?
freemymind 🇨ðŸ‡
npub1kl…0u2uq
2026-09-10 15:48:58 UTC
in reply to nevent1q…twq3
Author Public Key
npub1kl8e7s48j6cfr6zrmn53n5l0fsxustszj3fwmu9ahn0tnm9e8euq80u2uqPublished at
2026-09-10 15:48:58 UTCEvent JSON
{
"id": "00006f523dac7dbbb7828961568697c63bac0cf80e21c24982f85664a04f37dc",
"pubkey": "b7cf9f42a796b091e843dce919d3ef4c0dc82e029452edf0bdbcdeb9ecb93e78",
"created_at": 1789055338,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"58e82c9d9461ce4e1cd5239c47c15220c4a7f7bbaef5e20cccf1157c9bcb5e08",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"09885df594b2b0e34e787e00490d4cd4c5a4eff3b2e8f585e6e9a123689723dd",
"wss://nos.lol",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"b3ac53e4eb5062b7f3747e63fe73e671174daf06660ef71dc72a71c971edd893"
],
[
"client",
"Dark Wisp"
],
[
"nonce",
"47413",
"16"
]
],
"content": "Do you at least agree, that extreme situations, like earthquakes (as in Venezuela or Colombia recently), floods (as in Nepal) or Zunamis like the one in Fukushima cause a huge destruction. So the loss of value is inherently created naturally.\nWe live in a world, where it is normal, that nature destroys stuff, takes live and makes total worldwide wealth shrink.\n\nJust the same way illnesses are very powerful natural desasters, which can lower health of thousands of people and in extreme cases kill us.\n\nWhen such a natural disaster takes place, what is the first priority?\n\nIs it to help fast and focus on the people, where lives can be saved? Is the main concern to negociate best prices? I assume you know the mechanics of markets? When demand spikes and production didlnot have yet time to adapt to the demand, high prices are a natural result. The most expected result.\n\nYou state quiet a lot of extreme positions. You state interventions (as isolation and keeping distance) as propaganda.\n\nWhen you call it propaganda, do you assume, that viruses can spread equally fast independent of how many people meet eachother, how close they are to eachother or if they use protection like masks?\n\nSince these interventions stand on very strong logic explanations, that one can even explain to children. No doctor title needed to understand their efficiancy in lowering infectionrate.\n\nCould you might propose some alternative behavior, you would applaud people? The behavior you would have really liked to see?",
"sig": "a3698606748d100e505a013b0e783cec46ab8578141a6352a8e813fe1d134c7edc63cf6b8be2ddb2fac00145f9d55e437789adea4e11accf94f7f735d26d385c"
}