The main point I take away from this is that the "magnificent seven" are all mature companies, that need a growth stories like a start-up to justify the enormous stock prices. But if one is already a giant, multi-billion $ company, exponential growth is virtually impossible (not to mention, world-destroying) and requires ever more outlandish claims. To deflate these claims in the most powerful vector of critique.
The second point, which is kind of a classic, is not to ask what a technology "is" or "could do", but to ask who does it do it **for** and who does it do it "*to**. In other words, it's not technical capacities, but social relations that determine the social impact of a product
