i was making a social media post not a formal philosophical argument but okay 😇
btw "2" is a symbol that can represent anything linguistically, and the concepts that it represents doesn't have a truth value either (unless you count "truthiness" coercion in dynamic languages, where 0 is "false"). this is likewise not objective because "2" has to be contextualized like any other symbol in a processing context. trinitarian christians might say "three is one" and take that to be a profound universal truth, but even if you agree in-context, you might disagree arithmetically. try making that statement in a programming language and you get "false".
mostly the thing i am commenting on is the idealism and also the strange coincidence that the universal ideal just so happens to align with whoever is stating it. it's not me saying this, it's the universe which is objectively true and agrees with me and is my friend. i can't take responsibility for any of my beliefs or statements because i am only describing a universal truth. i'm just a messenger, i don't make the rules, etc.
a
npub1r2…nnek5
2026-03-03 14:31:02 UTC
in reply to nevent1q…45np
Author Public Key
npub1r2y837aq8x78anerhh6sh3czvd33s8jc800v0d9s6ag7505yxc9qrnnek5Seen on
wss://relay.momostr.pinkPublished at
2026-03-03 14:31:02 UTCEvent JSON
{
"id": "114fadf724d01d2d0c3eda61f363bd78ad930a00066d4b11a64b34ae3c941dad",
"pubkey": "1a8878fba039bc7ecf23bdf50bc7026363181e583bdec7b4b0d751ea3e84360a",
"created_at": 1772548262,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"p",
"1a8878fba039bc7ecf23bdf50bc7026363181e583bdec7b4b0d751ea3e84360a"
],
[
"p",
"90145ec08015943f92ec5667f8d078beb6a40c9f7414b47d709eeca291cc910d"
],
[
"e",
"07a4a97ab742824cf5f7a064bba5195fd37c00fe004509ee3ee7ec3ab9260106",
"",
"root",
"90145ec08015943f92ec5667f8d078beb6a40c9f7414b47d709eeca291cc910d"
],
[
"e",
"e0efac03470587dca870f4078fe0baea5f247839afa7e73f144898b8f287ae76",
"",
"reply",
"90145ec08015943f92ec5667f8d078beb6a40c9f7414b47d709eeca291cc910d"
],
[
"proxy",
"https://fedi.layer02.net/objects/64e1681c-f178-4604-b70c-96e3bb6ec8f1",
"activitypub"
],
[
"L",
"pink.momostr"
],
[
"l",
"pink.momostr.activitypub:https://fedi.layer02.net/objects/64e1681c-f178-4604-b70c-96e3bb6ec8f1",
"pink.momostr"
],
[
"-"
]
],
"content": "i was making a social media post not a formal philosophical argument but okay 😇\r\n\r\nbtw \"2\" is a symbol that can represent anything linguistically, and the concepts that it represents doesn't have a truth value either (unless you count \"truthiness\" coercion in dynamic languages, where 0 is \"false\"). this is likewise not objective because \"2\" has to be contextualized like any other symbol in a processing context. trinitarian christians might say \"three is one\" and take that to be a profound universal truth, but even if you agree in-context, you might disagree arithmetically. try making that statement in a programming language and you get \"false\".\r\n\r\nmostly the thing i am commenting on is the idealism and also the strange coincidence that the universal ideal just so happens to align with whoever is stating it. it's not me saying this, it's the universe which is objectively true and agrees with me and is my friend. i can't take responsibility for any of my beliefs or statements because i am only describing a universal truth. i'm just a messenger, i don't make the rules, etc.",
"sig": "2e04f9491995db12af7c4c266e6ea005f7a5c30fc6f15c5edf60b6fdc488ab2c8b85ab3e5834d60ba0c498334c8c18b1d2778cd739aabe7741c9b3964095b6b8"
}