False Imprisonment
(related to the Austin Yogurt Shop Murders)
The murders of four young women at a yogurt shop in Austin, Texas nearly 34 years ago has been in the news for the last few days after it was announced that DNA and ballistics testing results have tied the crime to a serial killer who died by suicide 25 years ago. The identification of the murderer has fairly been touted as a triumph of persistence by investigators who refused to give up on the case. Too bad investigators initially charged, convicted, and put two innocent persons in prison. Oops.
One thing that has received very little mention in recent news articles about the case is the wrongful conviction and imprisonment for nearly ten years of two persons who were coerced into falsely confessing to the crimes. As I recall, one of the two claimed he was interrogated by a police officer holding a gun to his head. After their release after nearly ten years in prison at least one of the two sought compensation under Texas law for wrongful conviction and imprisonment. But he was denied by Texas judges who, perhaps based on wishes of some prosecutors to retrial him, thought he was not really innocent. Is that not also a tragedy? It seems to me the injustice of the false charges, convictions, imprisonment, and victimization of two men who are still living today should be a bigger part of news stories. That this angle has been mostly ignored tell us something about a retributive emphasis that dominates the justice paradigm in the U.S. at the expense of what could otherwise be a more civilized restorative approach, and how that paradigm influences the narrative in mainstream U.S. journalism.
#Austin #Texas #Murder #Justice #Courts #Judges #Journalism #Law #Police #Prison #Jail #Retribution #Rhetoric #Civilization #Morality #Ethics #RestorativeJustice
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/suspect-identified-in-infamous-texas-yogurt-shop-murder-case-48-hours/