I’ve never seen a media defender address this critique directly. Something like “one of the most important things happening today is two Dan Sullivans because __”
RE: https://bsky.app/profile/did:plc:ig5djks6d6e6kyet32abh5zs/post/3mz5b7koy2k2n
I wrote about the New York Times’ multimedia full-court press on the dumb Alaska story — a dozen print, video, audio, and newsletter reports at last count — and the news media’s responsibility to cover things in proportion to their importance.
[www.findinggravity.net/the-new-york...](https://www.findinggravity.net/the-new-york-times-invents-a-democratic-scandal-while-ignoring-a-new-trump-rape-allegation/ )
https://porcini.us-east.host.bsky.network/xrpc/com.atproto.sync.getBlob?did=did:plc:ig5djks6d6e6kyet32abh5zs&cid=bafkreig5euv2y7zvmpspleyvfmu54vybq6st26zinjepq6hzq5vs7dtl6a