Here's the deleted Odin article, for reference:
https://archive.md/gItVL
It seems to me that topics that have a genuine community following deserve an article, even if the commercial or peer review publications haven't thus far found it interesting.
A counter argument is that if you relaxed notability requirements, you'd also let in endless amounts of vanity, spam, scams, and AI dross. Maybe it's hard to distinguish one from the other in a rules-based bureaucratic way, such as Wikipedia uses.