nprofile1qy2hwumn8ghj7un9d3shjtnyd968gmewwp6kyqpq5ydf0s5h282c2xudq6ny6a893x4cfl2c8pteju56xe4greqwh39s8adfhn (nprofile…dfhn) nprofile1qy2hwumn8ghj7un9d3shjtnyd968gmewwp6kyqpqg2ls0s22j9pq5pzatcj3fptwytef6xhp8pfkrhslg0l4un8a055qr7g56g (nprofile…g56g) I wondered if this query might be related to a documented pantograph master size.
‘Midpoint’ implies something halfway, and I wasn’t sure if that was what you meant. Given that optical size modifications accelerate towards the small end, I wonder if one could indeed identify a midpoint in terms of the average of the stem thickness at the smallest and largest sizes?
Applying that calculation to the Sitka family, I end up very close to the nominal Subhead size (which in Sitka targets 16.7pt).