Hello fellow software people, I have a question: If you were tasked at increasing the quality of the code written at your company what would you do?
For our purposes assume quality means: maintainable, human readable code, with minimal bugs, where complex solutions are only desired when necessary. This definition is tweakable.
Replies/boosts are encouraged. Opinions are expected, because I suspect this is a very opinionated topic.
Things off the table: firing people, switching languages or frameworks.
fancysandwiches
npub1l6…rg24j
2025-08-13 17:06:24 UTC
Author Public Key
npub1l662n285m8y8nvglv2qynkw0qf3pjqq7tllja4f0qhu3qzsger4qxrg24jSeen on
wss://relay.momostr.pinkPublished at
2025-08-13 17:06:24 UTCEvent JSON
{
"id": "88ef6eb34b18a468cbbf9779cfcfe5928d613b1103adbb0feb17e7d66ce8f321",
"pubkey": "feb4a9a8f4d9c879b11f628049d9cf026219001e5fff2ed52f05f9100a08c8ea",
"created_at": 1755104784,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"proxy",
"https://neuromatch.social/@fancysandwiches/115022547154691667",
"web"
],
[
"proxy",
"https://neuromatch.social/users/fancysandwiches/statuses/115022547154691667",
"activitypub"
],
[
"L",
"pink.momostr"
],
[
"l",
"pink.momostr.activitypub:https://neuromatch.social/users/fancysandwiches/statuses/115022547154691667",
"pink.momostr"
],
[
"-"
]
],
"content": "Hello fellow software people, I have a question: If you were tasked at increasing the quality of the code written at your company what would you do?\n\nFor our purposes assume quality means: maintainable, human readable code, with minimal bugs, where complex solutions are only desired when necessary. This definition is tweakable.\n\nReplies/boosts are encouraged. Opinions are expected, because I suspect this is a very opinionated topic.\n\nThings off the table: firing people, switching languages or frameworks.",
"sig": "0e645c6c7eac07f800074bb95403f0c1d41e93b0dfd351aaeea731c23b695da86962bf83848beb1c0bf5698c186d4a445edd28f010456149a013e2aeb3eb8cb7"
}