Could to be a typo for 30-50, although it wouldn't make sense to not check on people in their twenties, in which case it's 20-50.
Pity one of them couldn't just publish it on arVix without retaliation.
If true, the evolutionary implications are fascinating. Would seem to go against common sense, or is a K type selection pressure, since r types are going to be impregnating women at a high rate (and only a few of them per studies, most men way, way back in pre-history didn't procreate).
So something likely to be an influence in much more recent western European evolutionary development for instance.