josh susser on Nostr: It's not just that I think LLMs and so-called "generative" AI produce unreliable, ...
It's not just that I think LLMs and so-called "generative" AI produce unreliable, erroneous, or even dangerous output. It's not just that it uses energy at rates that are screwing with decarbonization efforts and could ruin any chance we have at fighting climate change. It's not just that it is always based on uncompensated appropriation (i.e. "theft") of human creativity and is basically a plagiarism laundering machine.
It's that when someone uses AI, I assume they know these things, but don't care.
I understand that there are valid use cases for AI, but I don't believe the current LLM tech is good enough even without the big downsides. But there's a new Gold Rush and all the tech investors want to make some fortunes, so they will push this crap on everyone until we are all lost in a fog of bullshit explanations and creepy, homogenized art.
If I see a post that uses AI generated art, I won't read the post. If someone posts something "from ChatGPT" I will ignore it entirely. If it wasn't worth your time to write it, it's not worth my time to read it, and I won't willingly participate in the rise of such a dangerous, wasteful, and unethical technology.
Published at
2024-10-02 16:19:09 UTCEvent JSON
{
"id": "9e55a28f29533f855bfff97e151bd3f48aecab6239f396593d4ad8ec93c3759e",
"pubkey": "b112bf29f2ad83d210bc239f9ae3783bf8ede2726ace9b339381b67439947aff",
"created_at": 1727885949,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"proxy",
"https://autistics.life/@joshsusser/113238733606775517",
"web"
],
[
"content-warning",
"on rejecting AI \"generated\" output"
],
[
"proxy",
"https://autistics.life/users/joshsusser/statuses/113238733606775517",
"activitypub"
],
[
"L",
"pink.momostr"
],
[
"l",
"pink.momostr.activitypub:https://autistics.life/users/joshsusser/statuses/113238733606775517",
"pink.momostr"
],
[
"-"
]
],
"content": "It's not just that I think LLMs and so-called \"generative\" AI produce unreliable, erroneous, or even dangerous output. It's not just that it uses energy at rates that are screwing with decarbonization efforts and could ruin any chance we have at fighting climate change. It's not just that it is always based on uncompensated appropriation (i.e. \"theft\") of human creativity and is basically a plagiarism laundering machine.\n\nIt's that when someone uses AI, I assume they know these things, but don't care.\n\nI understand that there are valid use cases for AI, but I don't believe the current LLM tech is good enough even without the big downsides. But there's a new Gold Rush and all the tech investors want to make some fortunes, so they will push this crap on everyone until we are all lost in a fog of bullshit explanations and creepy, homogenized art.\n\nIf I see a post that uses AI generated art, I won't read the post. If someone posts something \"from ChatGPT\" I will ignore it entirely. If it wasn't worth your time to write it, it's not worth my time to read it, and I won't willingly participate in the rise of such a dangerous, wasteful, and unethical technology.",
"sig": "1c81ecd18e2859f53625e43d990133c9bfea0b1f2652c93fc2a23324169b084765b5a340de0e346653d58424166f2d4cc31c98b6f97fc2979ce8648d6b85c5bb"
}