I try to be optimistic about academia, but then there are evenings like today...
I am reviewing a textbook on GenAI and second language teaching for a renowned commercial publisher. Although I now priorise reviewing for scholar-led, non-commercial publishers, the topic is of personal interest to me and I accepted this invitation because I wanted to ensure that critical AI literacies were well represented in this new textbook (and decent financial compensation was offered, which I admit was also a motivation). This evening, I started reading the preface (which was short but promising) and the introduction. After a couple of pages of pleasant reading, I came across a statement that I thought was odd so I decided to follow up on the reference that was used to support this statement. It turned out that the DOI in the reference section returned a 404. And that the entire reference does not exist! This made me suspicious so I went through all references in Ch. 1 and found three additional hallucinated references and several more incorrect DOIs! I'm not reading any further – will now stop working and attempt to write a polite review tomorrow.
#AppliedLinguistics #SLA #GenAI #academia
Elen Le Foll 🇫🇷 🇬🇧 🇩🇪
npub1lq…s885l
2026-06-14 19:49:01 UTC
Author Public Key
npub1lqvt0nx0037wxkddpg9pyk8j0j93perhuj6wqtvjt7z5c9n5cwcq4s885lSeen on
wss://relay.momostr.pinkPublished at
2026-06-14 19:49:01 UTCEvent JSON
{
"id": "99f67a94a9f751d6767c6eb212ea492fa7378539b18abf9d21e1aff18b2c20a5",
"pubkey": "f818b7cccf7c7ce359ad0a0a1258f27c8b10e477e4b4e02d925f854c1674c3b0",
"created_at": 1781466541,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"proxy",
"https://fediscience.org/@ElenLeFoll/116750191259338384",
"web"
],
[
"t",
"appliedlinguistics"
],
[
"t",
"sla"
],
[
"t",
"genai"
],
[
"t",
"academia"
],
[
"proxy",
"https://fediscience.org/users/ElenLeFoll/statuses/116750191259338384",
"activitypub"
],
[
"L",
"pink.momostr"
],
[
"l",
"pink.momostr.activitypub:https://fediscience.org/users/ElenLeFoll/statuses/116750191259338384",
"pink.momostr"
],
[
"-"
]
],
"content": "I try to be optimistic about academia, but then there are evenings like today... \n\nI am reviewing a textbook on GenAI and second language teaching for a renowned commercial publisher. Although I now priorise reviewing for scholar-led, non-commercial publishers, the topic is of personal interest to me and I accepted this invitation because I wanted to ensure that critical AI literacies were well represented in this new textbook (and decent financial compensation was offered, which I admit was also a motivation). This evening, I started reading the preface (which was short but promising) and the introduction. After a couple of pages of pleasant reading, I came across a statement that I thought was odd so I decided to follow up on the reference that was used to support this statement. It turned out that the DOI in the reference section returned a 404. And that the entire reference does not exist! This made me suspicious so I went through all references in Ch. 1 and found three additional hallucinated references and several more incorrect DOIs! I'm not reading any further – will now stop working and attempt to write a polite review tomorrow.\n\n#AppliedLinguistics #SLA #GenAI #academia",
"sig": "aa5b0ff501c239057015ba5ce4767b3665bb75a89db73820c64daae9dd4e51fa3fab8b9db609803fe81599029c0d91710815b6af02736f3757f02d89874a5e98"
}