Join Nostr
2026-01-06 01:54:22 UTC
in reply to

🌱🏴‍🅰️🏳️‍⚧️🐧🔧 Ambiyelp on Nostr: Like I said in another reply it is not on anarchists to proscribe a foolproof ...

Like I said in another reply it is not on anarchists to proscribe a foolproof procedure or programme that can be failed or succeeded our main goal is to dismantle hierarchy and authority that prevents people developing the natural ability to freely associate and resolve conflict. With that said I have organisational preferences and concepts of how committees might be structured to balance democratic input and efficiency but they are just that preferences. I like democratic confederalism for example also the loose ideas presented by Anark in After the Revolution[2]

"
"Why do you not say how things will be operated under Anarchism?" is a question I have had to meet thousands of times. Because I believe that Anarchism can not consistently impose an iron-clad program or method on the future. The things every new generation has to fight, and which it can least overcome, are the burdens of the past, which holds us all as in a net. Anarchism, at least as I understand it, leaves posterity free to develop its own particular systems, in harmony with its needs. Our most vivid imagination can not foresee the potentialities of a race set free from external restraints.
"[1]

[1]
Emma Goldman, "Anarchism and Other Essays", Preface

[2]
http://libraryqxxiqakubqv3dc2bend2koqsndbwox2johfywcatxie26bsad.onion/library/daniel-baryon-after-the-revolution