Honest and provocative questions.
1) Why should they cut the tree they are living on?
2) Why do we have to assume they ALWAYS have a plan for everything?
3) And, more importantly, if so, self custody wouldn't have been taken into account as a minor nuisance to cope with in the master plan / grand scheme of things?
Really, why todays' Saylor's / BlackRocks' / Andy Back's suitcoin would be a resistance tool and not part of their solution?
If they are so powerful and allmighty do do we really think that self custody of a captured / increasingly centralized / non-widespread-MoE asset can make any difference against this Leviathan? Today Bitcoin's salvific belief sounds much to me like 'you can vote them out this time' meme.
