it has many negative hints about the speaker, but disregarding the speaker, it's fine. It's just
>women benefit LESS from men
>also men are so awful that men would vote for a regime that would make women benefit MORE from men
the fault is not in anything said, but in what's not said or even asked about: do women benefit from the status quo of women not benefiting as much from men? Would women not be happier under a regime where the labor supply halves but families continue to make the same amount of money and a woman can create a home with a family instead of doing boring makework or negative-value work in soul-crushing government and corporate offices?