You've completely missed the entire point.
The network is being eroded by large OP_RETURN payloads. I am not arguing that large OP_RETURN payloads should be allowed, nor am I arguing that removing large OP_RETURN payloads censors monetary transactions.
I am arguing that removing them with a consensus policy change has negative consequences.
Lawmakers don’t need new statutes; they can simply point to “Bitcoin already excludes Y”, and press for Z (e.g., “exclude sanctioned payload types”, “restrict non-KYC script paths”). You’ve demonstrated precedent and capability.
You are basically incapable to understand that a small group of developers being able to change Bitcoin's consensus rules (global law) has pros and cons and is not all positive.
I'm pretty sure I put "censorship" in quotes in the article most times. Probably not every time - it's a long article (which you most likely haven't read but decided to argue).
buckyfonds / Control-Plane Capital
npub1x9…p6rta
2025-11-12 14:48:48 UTC
in reply to nevent1q…n97r
Author Public Key
npub1x9hghmfunry8wcgg8s8w5e3drmkndw92r8qu0cp2l28u32aqqn9q6p6rtaPublished at
2025-11-12 14:48:48 UTCEvent JSON
{
"id": "50f69080133ac28739dbcfcefefa5782231cb50f0953bceeff5b10105b3ad78c",
"pubkey": "316e8bed3c98c87761083c0eea662d1eed36b8aa19c1c7e02afa8fc8aba004ca",
"created_at": 1762958928,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"0b015667aeca9c46dc7dc0a387ba02a147436f7e01c235506d9e6d7d3476874a",
"wss://nostr.oxtr.dev",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"0049d267a5e1a7a68cfb5dfee53d6c1bc6ced4b0a82cd4a110e3fb7da3c7eca3",
"wss://nostr.oxtr.dev",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"316e8bed3c98c87761083c0eea662d1eed36b8aa19c1c7e02afa8fc8aba004ca"
],
[
"p",
"314072c16fa9433e1374f62e5b02c8163946ed298a9cde3b1541513c29d19fff"
],
[
"p",
"16897bfab409ff12a768217e14d472dd5e8a2ae11cc0e3340bf2d6f67f5bac83"
],
[
"r",
"wss://eden.nostr.land/"
],
[
"r",
"wss://nos.lol/"
],
[
"r",
"wss://nostr.bitcoiner.social/"
],
[
"r",
"wss://nostr.thank.eu/"
],
[
"r",
"wss://nostr.wine/"
],
[
"r",
"wss://offchain.pub/"
],
[
"r",
"wss://puravida.nostr.land/"
],
[
"r",
"wss://purplepag.es/"
],
[
"r",
"wss://pyramid.fiatjaf.com/"
],
[
"r",
"wss://relay.damus.io/"
],
[
"r",
"wss://relay.mostr.pub/"
],
[
"r",
"wss://relay.nostr.band/"
],
[
"r",
"wss://relay.primal.net/"
],
[
"r",
"wss://relay.snort.social/"
],
[
"r",
"wss://lightningrelay.com/"
],
[
"r",
"wss://purplerelay.com/"
],
[
"r",
"wss://nostr-pub.wellorder.net/"
]
],
"content": "You've completely missed the entire point.\n\nThe network is being eroded by large OP_RETURN payloads. I am not arguing that large OP_RETURN payloads should be allowed, nor am I arguing that removing large OP_RETURN payloads censors monetary transactions.\n\nI am arguing that removing them with a consensus policy change has negative consequences. \n\nLawmakers don’t need new statutes; they can simply point to “Bitcoin already excludes Y”, and press for Z (e.g., “exclude sanctioned payload types”, “restrict non-KYC script paths”). You’ve demonstrated precedent and capability.\n\nYou are basically incapable to understand that a small group of developers being able to change Bitcoin's consensus rules (global law) has pros and cons and is not all positive.\n\nI'm pretty sure I put \"censorship\" in quotes in the article most times. Probably not every time - it's a long article (which you most likely haven't read but decided to argue).",
"sig": "69b95dea6e68eb2c2b9e7b7b1a264a2070441f79d90224488d2fd3c1f69476ad02866106989572ada3afa072ba4d9cc95737fbf0bc0e6d5a995f6ba80e396eee"
}