Nicolas Kayser-Bril on Nostr: Considering that the following terms were banned by courts or by law: "artificial ...
Considering that the following terms were banned by courts or by law: "artificial meat" (in 2025), "artificial milk" (in 2024) and "artificial butter" (in 1897), why is there no ban on "artificial intelligence"?
Couldn't we call it margrAIne for instance?
Published at
2025-12-09 09:45:36 UTCEvent JSON
{
"id": "5bafefc5c143b59b1f3b43a896bbcbb5a548f5f11be4def6f835f7c6091d02ba",
"pubkey": "99d499c24ee837036acb13b047af00ee7945cc512ffca8f0a6c7ed28897c8036",
"created_at": 1765273536,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"proxy",
"https://fediscience.org/users/nicolaskb/statuses/115688966456759933",
"activitypub"
],
[
"client",
"Mostr",
"31990:6be38f8c63df7dbf84db7ec4a6e6fbbd8d19dca3b980efad18585c46f04b26f9:mostr",
"wss://relay.ditto.pub/"
]
],
"content": "Considering that the following terms were banned by courts or by law: \"artificial meat\" (in 2025), \"artificial milk\" (in 2024) and \"artificial butter\" (in 1897), why is there no ban on \"artificial intelligence\"?\n\nCouldn't we call it margrAIne for instance?",
"sig": "4c7144352750134e02852c4ce999155cb920d502b8987ef63c045dd32b8ca08dd1e962f50e01597830297f6551beb5a53298cd36babd1be95d0b545fbc67128e"
}
