thanks! I hate it!
And I think you were right, not a ton useful here to share! I asked but you were right! It looks like a big survey to find out what seemed fairly obvious. “Addressing concerns regarding output quality, ethics, and human connection can significantly enhance the effective use of these technologies” - wow no kidding, more people might use it if it weren’t 1000% plagiarism?
I personally don’t care for it at work because while it’s fast maybe, you can’t trust output but also deskilling is a valid concern. If my junior team members use chatGPT to write things, how will they learn to write well? And edit? And critique?
I also think it’s watering down everything. If it all becomes averages of averages of averages, everything we write and read will sound the same and repetitive and content-neutral. I want to see new thoughts and nice ways of presenting them, not complete uniformity.
I am TERRIFIED that people think they should use AI for decision-making. What a bad idea. Yet in a work meeting our leader asked what would you like an AI for and a peer said to decide xxx thing that is a very hard decision and influenced by a ton of things. While maybe it could error check, compare vs regs, there is No Way it can make decisions.
Thanks for sharing.
3Jane Tessier Ashpool
npub1k0…ra4xs
2025-06-29 01:24:16 UTC
in reply to nevent1q…rmag
Author Public Key
npub1k048g2f5ghq23tfhfvz2t9c2vwfx535vqn0rd5mh538tpcxg8tasura4xsSeen on
wss://relay.momostr.pinkPublished at
2025-06-29 01:24:16 UTCEvent JSON
{
"id": "54b9f9001dfacb002f0a6a0575d2ce87d6e36608216015f4f7b26e31c7710936",
"pubkey": "b3ea74293445c0a8ad374b04a5970a63926a468c04de36d377a44eb0e0c83afb",
"created_at": 1751160256,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"p",
"f8347ec37d9f23959ba62dd8391fbcade87a7c071205c96f890432e5c047a6ed"
],
[
"e",
"3dae5c9370fbbb6618e1d36ee63c565e4a305fb7559d38fe2301db4ad7e5a630",
"",
"reply",
"f8347ec37d9f23959ba62dd8391fbcade87a7c071205c96f890432e5c047a6ed"
],
[
"e",
"e62ef0ee8cdb2610d1344e0d94a89e1a9674a7ef9f89e5c21fc2a7756ed9cb72",
"",
"root",
"f8347ec37d9f23959ba62dd8391fbcade87a7c071205c96f890432e5c047a6ed"
],
[
"p",
"ddb62c796b1efe18b04bb841a12dba2aa2d65489a3fccce4a507b3ce787777da"
],
[
"p",
"b3ea74293445c0a8ad374b04a5970a63926a468c04de36d377a44eb0e0c83afb"
],
[
"proxy",
"https://beige.party/@3janeTA/114764038595359654",
"web"
],
[
"proxy",
"https://beige.party/users/3janeTA/statuses/114764038595359654",
"activitypub"
],
[
"L",
"pink.momostr"
],
[
"l",
"pink.momostr.activitypub:https://beige.party/users/3janeTA/statuses/114764038595359654",
"pink.momostr"
],
[
"-"
]
],
"content": "thanks! I hate it!\n\nAnd I think you were right, not a ton useful here to share! I asked but you were right! It looks like a big survey to find out what seemed fairly obvious. “Addressing concerns regarding output quality, ethics, and human connection can significantly enhance the effective use of these technologies” - wow no kidding, more people might use it if it weren’t 1000% plagiarism? \n\nI personally don’t care for it at work because while it’s fast maybe, you can’t trust output but also deskilling is a valid concern. If my junior team members use chatGPT to write things, how will they learn to write well? And edit? And critique? \n\nI also think it’s watering down everything. If it all becomes averages of averages of averages, everything we write and read will sound the same and repetitive and content-neutral. I want to see new thoughts and nice ways of presenting them, not complete uniformity.\n\nI am TERRIFIED that people think they should use AI for decision-making. What a bad idea. Yet in a work meeting our leader asked what would you like an AI for and a peer said to decide xxx thing that is a very hard decision and influenced by a ton of things. While maybe it could error check, compare vs regs, there is No Way it can make decisions. \n\nThanks for sharing.",
"sig": "c5b993d343462f4e33b15fa62173450cca94264ad5339abd07e1145e613da9566b2e27e79969d960d64f287292ee24de5f931fa165d7186fb1ace2cb61e35420"
}