Join Nostr
2026-01-30 02:13:10 UTC

Stylus on Nostr: John Carlos Baez re The only problem I spot with the Python code is that the check ...

re https://johncarlosbaez.wordpress.com/2026/01/28/tiny-musical-intervals/

The only problem I spot with the Python code is that the check for "non-trivial" triples is redundant. Except for <0,0,0> there should be no non-trivial triples, and that is already excluded. Instead, this means no triples closer than 10 micro-cents would be printed.

Removing this check and extending the search range gives some more values on the frontier:<code>0.000884 cents | 1+5.103919569e-07 | [-573, 237, 85] | Tenney: 1146.0<br>0.000187 cents | 1+1.077468461e-07 | [2033, 90, -937] | Tenney: 4351.3<br>0.000159 cents | 1+9.185490346e-08 | [399, -1412, 792] | Tenney: 4475.9<br>0.000028 cents | 1+1.589178367e-08 | [1634, 1502, -1729] | Tenney: 8029.2<br>0.000006 cents | 1+3.442373941e-09 | [-7470, 2791, 1312] | Tenney: 14940.0<br>0.000002 cents | 1+1.373041014e-09 | [-22109, 20086, -4189] | Tenney: 63671.1<br></code>

none have as big a jump in cent accuracy as the quark of Baez.
nostr:note1fz27l2hk40v5y63msuqzqvru5028q70gzpdfk37pqldlhuzjs07q528j0h