Lau on Nostr: It's merely a plausibility, a paradigm, but fascinating. The paradigm balances in the ...

It's merely a plausibility, a paradigm, but fascinating. The paradigm balances in the present as choices are made that influence both future and past, making the past probabilistic just as the future. In every frame of the present you hold a coherent retention of the past belonging to that moment. This makes the experience seem congruent, in ratio, in perceived input. But it doesn't need to be.

The assumption here is that all input is perceived vibrations, not just classic senses but also memory and consciousness. Perceived input is read in the human interface, and response feels causal and congruent as described in analytical idealism.

Inspiration for this was a mnemonic ability I encountered on acid, and the writings of Bernardo Kastrup.