Audiogram with Mystery AI Hype Theater 3000 logo, title “Who’s Responsible for ‘Responsible AI’?” and subtitle “You can’t just slap a harm reduction framework onto chatbots and expect it to make sense” Captions: sava saheli singh: We see this a lot. Like, we see it in education, we see it in academia, we see it in research. A lot of language that's being used in communities to do things for communities, that come from the communities, are then taken and used as like, "This is the cool new buzzword. Let's apply this to this other thing." And the way that they describe the two sides, or the two extremes of AI use, is one is like, you know, it's restrictive and punitive. Two, it's permissive, allowing for exploration and innovation. And I'm like, no, no, no. Those are not the two poles. The first pole is critically informed rejection, and the other one is uncritical wholesale adoption. Let's be clear about what these two things are. Like you were saying earlier, Emily, there's never kind of the option to not.