sachin on Nostr: I understand the incentives for covering clarity, ai, govt debt, 'macro', oil, us ...
I understand the incentives for covering clarity, ai, govt debt, 'macro', oil, us politics, data centers, geopolitics, left-right tribalism, etc. by Bitcoin publications. No judgement there. Gotta get engagement, clicks and all by whatever means lead to sponsors.
But I'm wondering if the audience of such publications actually prefers majority coverage dedicated to the above, like say 70% of articles/posts/media, while Bitcoin-native news get 30% of coverage.
Published at
2026-09-22 21:05:20 UTCEvent JSON
{
"id": "ae28cc8d4f8450baad0aedf05b366fd36c26d16c85a01e24dad546f078b42ab4",
"pubkey": "34f1aaa6b1508de0bab3f086c4bd5bbd7b50f8599451c6e68ac955fc836e3cd6",
"created_at": 1790111120,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"client",
"YakiHonne",
"31990:20986fb83e775d96d188ca5c9df10ce6d613e0eb7e5768a0f0b12b37cdac21b3:1700732875747"
]
],
"content": "I understand the incentives for covering clarity, ai, govt debt, 'macro', oil, us politics, data centers, geopolitics, left-right tribalism, etc. by Bitcoin publications. No judgement there. Gotta get engagement, clicks and all by whatever means lead to sponsors. \n\nBut I'm wondering if the audience of such publications actually prefers majority coverage dedicated to the above, like say 70% of articles/posts/media, while Bitcoin-native news get 30% of coverage.",
"sig": "0fc2c0c218af02244f5e8e9b843979cc954ba3256745baeb45013a2f433bce7dec4cd45d9f3c76bc8f353860e17a7b4687539d09916d1e407190a23517621ce8"
}